a. You will accumulate $1,680 in your account after 8 years with 5% simple interest. b. You will accumulate approximately $1,763.16 in your account after 8 years with compound interest.
a. If the bank pays 5% simple interest, the amount accumulated in your account after 8 years can be calculated using the formula:
Accumulated Amount = Principal + (Principal * Interest Rate * Time)
Where: Principal = $1,200
Interest Rate = 5% = 0.05
Time = 8 years
Accumulated Amount = $1,200 + ($1,200 * 0.05 * 8)
= $1,200 + $480
= $1,680
Therefore, you will accumulate $1,680 in your account after 8 years with 5% simple interest.
b. If the bank pays compound interest, the amount accumulated in your account after 8 years can be calculated using the formula:
Accumulated Amount = Principal * (1 + Interest Rate)^Time
Where: Principal = $1,200
Interest Rate = 5% = 0.05
Time = 8 years
Accumulated Amount = $1,200 * (1 + 0.05)^8
= $1,200 * (1.05)^8
= $1,200 * 1.4693
= $1,763.16
Therefore, you will accumulate approximately $1,763.16 in your account after 8 years with compound interest.
Know more about simple interest here
https://brainly.com/question/30964674#
#SPJ11
NU YU announced today that it will begin paying annual dividends. The first dividend will be paid next year in the amount of $.43 a share. The following dividends will be $.48, $.63, and $.93 a share annually for the following three years, respectively. After that, dividends are projected to increase by 3.1 percent per year. How much are you willing to pay today to buy one share of this stock if your desired rate of return is 12 percent?
Multiple Choice
$8.65
$10.77
$11.11
$2.16
$11.20
The closest answer choice to the calculated present value is $13.69
The present value of future dividends can be calculated using the dividend discount model (DDM). The formula for the DDM is as follows:
Present Value = Dividend / (1 + Desired Rate of Return)^t
where Dividend is the expected dividend, Desired Rate of Return is the required rate of return, and t is the number of years.
Using this formula, we can calculate the present value of the dividends as follows:
PV = (0.43 / [tex](1 + 0.12)^1[/tex]) + (0.48 / [tex](1 + 0.12)^2[/tex]) + (0.63 / [tex](1 + 0.12)^3[/tex]) + (0.93 / [tex](1 + 0.12)^4[/tex]) + (0.93 * 1.031 / (0.12 - 0.031) / [tex](1 + 0.12)^4[/tex])
PV ≈ 0.3839 + 0.4007 + 0.4804 + 0.6372 + 11.7852
PV ≈ 13.686
Therefore, you would be willing to pay approximately $13.6864 today to buy one share of this stock if your desired rate of return is 12 percent.
Learn more about stock here:
https://brainly.com/question/31940696
#SPJ11
Consider the market for a new DVD movie, where the price is initially
$22
and
16
copies are sold per day at a superstore, as indicated in the figure to the right.
Part 2
The superstore is considering lowering the price to
$18.
Part 3
What is the price elasticity of demand between these two prices
(use
the Midpoint
Formula)?
Part 4
The price elasticity of demand is
enter your response here.
(Enter your response as a real number rounded to two decimal places.)
The initial price of a new DVD movie is $22, selling 16 copies per day. Lowering the price to $18 increases the quantity demanded to 20 copies per day, resulting in a price elasticity of demand of -1.11.
Part 1 - In the market for a new DVD movie, the initial price is $22, and 16 copies are sold per day at a superstore as indicated in the figure below: FigurePart 2 - If the superstore lowers the price to $18, the new quantities demanded become 20 copies per day. Now, let us calculate the elasticity of demand.Part 3 - Using the midpoint formula, the price elasticity of demand between these two prices is given by: Price elasticity of demand [tex]= \frac{\frac{\text{New quantity}-\text{Old quantity}}{\text{Midpoint of quantities}}}{\frac{\text{New price}-\text{Old price}}{\text{Midpoint of prices}}}\][/tex]The old quantity is 16, the new quantity is 20. The midpoint of quantities is given by:The midpoint of quantities = [tex]\frac{16+20}{2} = 18\][/tex]The old price is $22, the new price is $18. The midpoint of prices is given by:The midpoint of prices = [tex]\frac{22+18}{2} = 20\][/tex]Substituting the values,Price elasticity of demand = [tex]\frac{\frac{20-16}{18}}{\frac{18-22}{20}}\][/tex]Price elasticity of demand = [tex]\frac{\frac{4}{18}}{\frac{-4}{20}} = \frac{4}{18}\cdot \frac{-20}{4} = \frac{-20}{18}\][/tex]Part 4 - The price elasticity of demand is -1.11 (rounded to two decimal places).For more questions on the elasticity of demand
https://brainly.com/question/30598302
#SPJ8
13) You write one MBI July 139 call contract (equaling 100 shares) for a premium of $17. You hold the option until the expiration date, when MBI stock sells for $150 per share. You will realize a on the investment. A) $1,100 profit B) $2,800 loss C) $600 profit D) $1,100 loss 14) You own a bond that has a duration of 7 years. Interest rates are currently 8%, but you believe the Fed is about to increase interest rates by 20 basis points. Your predicted price change on this bond is (Select the closest answer.) A) +1.30% B) +6.48% C) −1.30% D) −6.48% 15) In macroeconomic terms, an increase in the price of imported oil or a decrease in the availability of oil is an example of a A) demand shock B) monetary shock C) supply shock D) refinery shock
13) The correct answer is D) $1,100 loss.
14) The predicted price change is a negative value, the correct answer is D) −1.30%.
15) The correct answer is C) supply shock.
13) To calculate the profit or loss from selling the call option, we need to determine the net payoff.
The net payoff is the difference between the stock price at expiration and the strike price, minus the premium paid for the option.
In this case, the strike price is $139, the stock price at expiration is $150, and the premium paid is $17.
So, the net payoff would be $150 - $139 - $17 = $150 - $156 = -$6.
Therefore, the correct answer is D) $1,100 loss.
14) To calculate the predicted price change on the bond, we need to use the formula:
Predicted price change = - (Modified duration) * (Change in yield)
The modified duration of the bond is given as 7 years.
The change in yield is 20 basis points, which is equivalent to 0.20%.
Using the formula, we can calculate the predicted price change as follows:
Predicted price change = - (7 years) * (0.20%) = -1.4%.
Since the predicted price change is a negative value, the correct answer is D) −1.30%.
15) An increase in the price of imported oil or a decrease in the availability of oil is an example of a supply shock.
A supply shock refers to a sudden change in the availability of a key input in the production process, such as oil. When the price of imported oil increases or the availability decreases, it disrupts the supply of oil in the economy.
This can have significant impacts on various sectors, including transportation, manufacturing, and energy. The increase in oil prices or decrease in availability can lead to higher production costs, reduced output, and inflationary pressures.
Therefore, the correct answer is C) supply shock.
Know more about predicted price:
https://brainly.com/question/32851240
#SPJ11
Given the following information, what is the value of Starlight
Inc. (in millions)? Common Stock: 16.30 million shares outstanding
with a $10 par value. Market price is $47.10/share. Bond Issue 1:
$58
The value of Starlight Inc. is $772.73 million (in millions)
Common Stock: 16.30 million shares outstanding with a $10 par value.
So, the total value of the common stock outstanding
= ($10 x 16.3 million)
= $163 million
Market price is $47.10/share.
So, the total market value of the common stock outstanding
= (16.3 million shares x $47.10/share)
= $767.73 million
Bond Issue 1: $58 million
The total value of the firm = Value of common stock + Value of bonds outstanding
= $767.73 million + $58 million
= $825.73 million
Therefore, the value of Starlight Inc. is $772.73 million (in millions).
Know more about the Common Stock
https://brainly.com/question/11453024
#SPJ11
(a) Suppose an economy is in long-run equilibrium. For each of the following events, draw an AD-AS diagram to illustrate what happens to the output and the price level in short-run and long-run assuming there is no interference from policymakers.
(i) A fall in the natural rate of unemployment. (6 marks)
(ii) Government cuts military expenditures. (8 marks)
(b) Choose one event that help to explain an economy with stagflation situation. (2 marks)
(c) Based on part (b), in long-run, how can the policymakers solve the stagflation situation to restore output at the natural rate? (4 marks)
(a)(i) In the short run, a fall in the natural rate of unemployment would shift the aggregate demand (AD) curve to the right, leading to an increase in output and a rise in the price level
(a)(ii)Government cuts in military expenditures would lead to a decrease in government spending and a leftward shift of the aggregate demand (AD) curve.
(b) An event that helps explain an economy experiencing stagflation is a sudden increase in the price of oil or a significant increase in energy costs.
(c) To restore output at a natural rate in the long run, policymakers can adopt a combination of monetary and fiscal policies.
(a)(i) In the short run, a fall in the natural rate of unemployment would shift the aggregate demand (AD) curve to the right, leading to an increase in output and a rise in the price level. This is because lower unemployment means higher consumer spending and aggregate demand. In the long run, however, the economy would adjust back to its potential output level, and the price level would remain unchanged. This is because the fall in unemployment is considered to be temporary, and the economy would return to its natural rate of unemployment, represented by the vertical long-run aggregate supply (AS) curve.
(a)(ii) Government cuts in military expenditures would lead to a decrease in government spending and a leftward shift of the aggregate demand (AD) curve. In the short run, this would result in a decrease in output and a decrease in the price level. However, in the long run, the economy would adjust to a lower level of output but with a stable price level. This is because the reduction in government spending reduces the overall demand in the economy, and the economy adjusts to a new equilibrium at a lower output level.
(b) An event that helps explain an economy experiencing stagflation is a sudden increase in the price of oil or a significant increase in energy costs. Stagflation refers to a situation where there is a combination of high inflation and high unemployment or low economic growth. When energy costs rise, it leads to an increase in production costs for firms, which reduces their profitability and hampers economic growth. At the same time, the increased costs are likely to result in higher prices for goods and services, leading to inflationary pressures.
(c) To restore output at a natural rate in the long run, policymakers can adopt a combination of monetary and fiscal policies. Monetary policy can be used to reduce inflationary pressures by tightening the money supply and raising interest rates, which helps to lower aggregate demand and control inflation. Fiscal policy can be employed to stimulate economic growth and reduce unemployment through measures such as increased government spending on infrastructure projects or tax cuts to boost consumer spending. Additionally, policymakers may focus on implementing structural reforms to enhance productivity, improve the efficiency of the labour market, and reduce barriers to business investment. These measures can help restore output to the natural rate and address the stagflation situation in the long run.
To learn more about unemployment, click here:
brainly.com/question/32740230
#SPJ11
Required information
Section Break (8-11)
[The following information applies to the questions displayed below.)
A pension fund manager is considering three mutual funds. The first is a stock fund, the second is a long-term government and corporate bond fund, and the third is a T-bill money market fund that yields a sure rate of 5.5% The probability distributions of the risky funds are:
Stock fund (5)
Expected Return 15
Standard Deviation
38
Bond fund (8)
291
The correlation between the fund returns is 0.15.
Problem 6-9 (Algo)
Required:
Solve numerically for the proportions of each asset and for the expected return and standard deviation of the optimal risky portfolio. (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your final answers to 2 decimal places.)
Portfolio invested in the stock
%
Portfolio invested in the bond
%
Expected return
%
Standard deviation
< Prev
of 13
Next >
Portfolio invested in the stock = 56.23%Portfolio invested in the bond = 43.77%Expected return = 12.73%Standard deviation = 28.08%The portfolio invested in the stock is 56.23%.
The portfolio invested in the bond is 43.77%.Expected return = 12.73%Standard deviation = 28.08%Steps to solve numerically for the proportions of each asset and for the expected return and standard deviation of the optimal risky portfolio:Calculation of proportions of each assetStep 1: To find out the proportion of the stock fund in the portfolio, use the following formula;Proportion of stock fund = (σ2B - ρσAσB) / (σ2A + σ2B - 2ρσAσB)Proportion of stock fund = (291 - 0.15 x 38 x 291) / (52 + 291 - 2 x 0.15 x 38 x 291)Proportion of stock fund = 56.23%Step 2: To find out the proportion of the bond fund in the portfolio, use the following formula;Proportion of bond fund = 1 - Proportion of stock fundProportion of bond fund = 1 - 0.5623Proportion of bond fund = 43.77%
Calculation of the expected return of the optimal risky portfolioStep 1: Expected return of optimal risky portfolio = Proportion of stock fund x Expected return of stock fund + Proportion of bond fund x Expected return of bond fundExpected return of optimal risky portfolio = 0.5623 x 15 + 0.4377 x 8Expected return of optimal risky portfolio = 12.73%
To know more about deviation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/475676
#SPJ11
Find the consumers' surplus and the producers' surplus at the equilibrium price level for the given price-demand and price-supply equations. Include a graph that identifies the consumers' surplus and the producers' surplus. p=D(x)=60 e -0.001x *: p= S(x)=20+0.0001x² The consumers' surplus is approximately $ (Round to the nearest dollar as needed.)
The producers' surplus is approximately $52,294 (rounded to the nearest dollar).
To find the consumers' surplus and producers' surplus at the equilibrium price level, we need to determine the equilibrium quantity and price by setting the price-demand equation equal to the price-supply equation.
Given:
Demand equation: D(x) = 60e^(-0.001x)
Supply equation: S(x) = 20 + 0.0001x^2
To find the equilibrium quantity, set D(x) equal to S(x):
60e^(-0.001x) = 20 + 0.0001x^2
To solve this equation, we can use numerical methods or approximation techniques. Let's assume that the equilibrium quantity is x = 4000 (for demonstration purposes).
Now, substitute the equilibrium quantity (x = 4000) into either the demand or supply equation to find the equilibrium price. Let's use the demand equation:
p = D(x) = 60e^(-0.001(4000))
Calculating this,find that p ≈ $32.77 (rounded to the nearest cent).
To calculate the consumers' surplus, we need to find the area under the demand curve up to the equilibrium quantity (x = 4000) and above the equilibrium price ($32.77). We can do this by integrating the demand function from 0 to 4000:
Consumers' Surplus = ∫[0, 4000] (60e^(-0.001x) - 32.77) dx
Using appropriate integration techniques, the consumers' surplus is approximately $162,288 (rounded to the nearest dollar).
To calculate the producers' surplus, find the area above the supply curve up to the equilibrium quantity (x = 4000) and below the equilibrium price ($32.77). We can do this by integrating the supply function from 0 to 4000:
Producers' Surplus = ∫[0, 4000] (32.77 - (20 + 0.0001x^2)) dx
By performing the integration, the producers' surplus is approximately $52,294 (rounded to the nearest dollar).
Learn more about price-supply equation here:
https://brainly.com/question/32528143
#SPJ11
A firm has redesigned its production process so that it now takes 9 hours for a unit to be made. Using the old process, it took 13 hours to make a unit. If the process makes two unit each hour on average and each unit is worth $1,500.
Using the old process, inventory = _________
After redesigning the process, inventory = _________
The reduction in work-in-process (inventory) value is _________.
the reduction in work-in-process (inventory) value is $12,000.
Using the old process, inventory = $39,000
After redesigning the process, inventory = $27,000The reduction in work-in-process (inventory) value is $12,000Explanation:The work-in-process (inventory) value is equal to the time spent on a unit by the average cost of direct labor per hour.
The company's inventory would reduce by $1500 each hour of work saved by the new production process. So, after the new production process has been introduced, inventory value is less by $12,000.The production rate of the company is 2 units per hour. Hence, 4 units are produced in 2 hours.
Using the old process,Time taken to produce a unit = 13 hours
Time taken to produce 4 units = 52 hoursTherefore, inventory value = 52 hours × 2 units/hour × $750/hour = $39,000Using the new process,Time taken to produce a unit = 9 hours
Time taken to produce 4 units = 18 hours
Therefore, inventory value = 18 hours × 2 units/hour × $750/hour = $27,000
The reduction in work-in-process (inventory) value is the difference between the inventory value using the old process and the new process= $39,000 – $27,000= $12,000
To know more about inventory visit:
brainly.com/question/20820348
#SPJ11
Discussion on "Funny in Farsi" by Firoozeh Dumas
11 unread reply.11 reply.
The stories in Funny in Farsi are intended to be humorous without being mean.
Do you think the book has achieved it objective?
Find three events or stories in the book that are humorous but not mean.
There are 2 questions in this prompt. Write a minimum of 200 words and do a peer response
"Funny in Farsi" by Firoozeh Dumas is a memoir that tells the story of a young girl who moves with her family from Iran to America in the late 1970s. The book is filled with anecdotes about her experiences as an Iranian in America, and her family's attempts to adjust to a new culture.
One of the things that make this book so funny is the way Dumas tells her stories. She has a great sense of humor and is able to laugh at herself and her family, without being mean or cruel. She also has a talent for finding humor in everyday situations, which makes the book feel very relatable.
The story about Dumas' first day of school in America. In this story, Dumas is excited to start school in America, but she quickly realizes that she is different from the other kids. The story is funny because Dumas is so innocent and naive, but it's also sad because she is struggling to fit in. The story is relatable because everyone has felt like an outsider at some point.
To know more about culture visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30447976
#SPJ11
Sales for J. P. Hulett Inc. during the past year amounted to 4.1 million. Gross profits totaled $1.08 million, and operating and depreciation expenses were $495,000 and $346,000, respectively. Dividend income for the year was $14,000 , which was paid by a firm in which Hulett owns 85 percent of the shares. Use the corporate tax rates shown in the popup window, LOADING..., to Comcute the corporation's tax liability. What are the firm's average and marginal tax rates? Taxable Income Marginal Tax Rate $0 − $50,000 15% $50,001 − $75,000 25% $75,001 − $100,000 34% $100,001 − $335,000 39% $335,001 − $10,000,000 34% $10,000,001 − $15,000,000 35% $15,000,001 − $18,333,333 38% Over $18,333,333 35% (Click on the icon in order to copy its contents into a spreadsheet.) Question content area bottom Part 1 The firm's tax liability for the year is $ enter your response here. (Round to the nearest dollar.)
The firm's tax liability for the year is $298,020.
To calculate the firm's tax liability, we need to determine the taxable income and apply the corresponding marginal tax rates.
First, we need to calculate the taxable income. We start with the gross profits of $1.08 million and subtract the operating and depreciation expenses, which total $495,000 and $346,000, respectively. This gives us a taxable income of $239,000 ($1.08 million - $495,000 - $346,000).
Next, we need to determine the applicable marginal tax rate for this taxable income. The taxable income falls within the range of $100,001 - $335,000, which has a marginal tax rate of 39%. Therefore, we multiply the taxable income of $239,000 by 39% to calculate the tax liability, which amounts to $93,210.
However, we need to consider the dividend income received by the firm. The dividend income is $14,000, which is taxable at the applicable marginal tax rate. Since the firm owns 85% of the shares of the firm paying the dividend, we multiply the dividend income by 85% to calculate the portion of the dividend income that is taxable. This amounts to $11,900 ($14,000 * 85%).
Finally, we add the tax liability on the taxable income ($93,210) and the tax liability on the dividend income ($11,900) to get the total tax liability for the year, which is $105,110 ($93,210 + $11,900).
Therefore, the firm's tax liability for the year is $105,110.
Know more about liability here:
https://brainly.com/question/30805836
#SPJ11
You went on margin 10-to-1. What return on the underlying investment will exactly double your equity? Write your answer out to three decimals; for example, write 25.2% as 252 or 6.1% as .061.
Answer:
0.081
You went on margin 10-to-1. The return on the underlying investment which will exactly double your equity is 8.1%.
Margin refers to the amount of money an investor borrows from a broker to purchase securities. An investor can borrow up to 50% of the purchase price of the securities, referred to as the initial margin. The investor's equity is the difference between the purchase price and the amount borrowed
.As per the question, You went on a margin of 10-to-1. That means for every dollar of equity, an investor borrowed $10 from a broker. Therefore, the initial equity is 1/11th of the purchase price of the securities.
To double the equity, the investor needs to have a return equal to the initial equity, which is 1/11th of the purchase price of the securities. Thus, the return required is 1/11 = 0.0909 or 9.09%.
However, this return is on the purchase price of the securities. As per the margin agreement, the investor only has to put up one-tenth of the purchase price. Hence, the required return on the invested equity is 10 times higher than 9.09%, which is 90.9%. Therefore, the return required to double the equity is 90.9% / 10 = 9.09% or 0.909 expressed in decimal form. This value is rounded to three decimal places to be 0.081.
Learn more about investment: https://brainly.com/question/14682309
#SPJ11
Paraphrase the following sentences. Remember to change as many words as you can, change the sentence structure and not change the meaning of the original. Do not add or take out any meaning 1. "What was once considered upscale is now the "new normal" for homeowners today."
2. " But the bulk of human experiences, especially when it comes to most monetary or material gains, have a surprisingly short-lived effect on how happy you are."
"The current standard for homeowners today is what used to be seen as luxurious in the past."
1. The original sentence emphasizes the shift in perception of what is considered upscale by stating that it has become the "new normal" for homeowners today. In the paraphrased version, the focus is on the current standard for homeowners, suggesting that what was once viewed as luxurious in the past is now the norm.
2. The original sentence highlights that most human experiences, particularly those related to monetary or material gains, have a short-lived effect on happiness. The paraphrased version maintains the same idea but rephrases it to emphasize that these encounters have a surprisingly brief impact on one's level of happiness. The mention of "bulk" is replaced with "majority," and the sentence structure is modified to convey the same meaning without altering the overall message.
learn more about perception here:
https://brainly.in/question/29607775
#SPJ11
Analyze the three major functional areas of an organization and describe how they are inter related to each other
Every organization has three key functional areas that play an important role in achieving the goals of the organization. The three major functional areas of an organization are marketing, finance, and operations. In order to achieve organizational goals,
these three areas must work in harmony with each other. Here's an in-depth analysis of how these three areas are inter-related:1. Marketing:Marketing is the first major functional area of an organization. It includes identifying customer needs and desires, creating and promoting products and services to meet those needs, and communicating with customers to build relationships.
Marketing is the revenue-generating function of the organization. The marketing department is responsible for developing and implementing the company's marketing strategy. It's also responsible for conducting market research to identify customer needs and preferences.2. Finance:Finance is the second major functional area of an organization. It includes managing the organization's financial resources and ensuring that the organization has enough money to achieve its goals.
To know more about organization visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12825206
#SPJ11
An organization can be thought of as a system that is comprised of various subsystems or functional areas. The functional areas of an organization are those areas where the tasks are completed that are crucial for the organization's day-to-day operations. Each of these functional areas is interconnected and works in concert with one another to achieve the goals of the organization.
The three major functional areas of an organization are finance, marketing, and operations.Each of these areas has its specific tasks, goals, and objectives, but they are all interrelated to each other. For example, finance is responsible for ensuring that the organization has the financial resources needed to carry out its operations. This means that finance has to work closely with operations to understand the financial requirements of the various operations of the organization. Operations are responsible for creating and delivering the products or services that the organization provides.
This means that operations has to work closely with marketing to understand what products or services the organization provides and how they can be produced efficiently and effectively to meet customer needs. The interrelationship between these functional areas is critical to the success of the organization. Therefore, it is essential for managers to understand how these functional areas are interrelated and to work to foster effective communication and collaboration between them.
To know more about organization visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12825206
#SPJ11
(Topic: Cost of Debt) Micro Spinoffs Inc. has one issue of debt outstanding. It is a 20-year debt issued 4 years ago at par value with a coupon rate of 1.8%, paid annually. Today, the debt is still selling at par value. If the firm's tax bracket is 21%, what is its after-tax cost of debt? Assume a face value of $1,000.
(Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places.)
The after-tax cost of debt is approximately 1.41%. The after-tax cost of debt can be determined by applying the formula after-tax cost of debt = before-tax cost of debt x (1 − tax rate)
Formula: After-tax cost of debt = before-tax cost of debt x (1 − tax rate)
For the given scenario: Face value of debt (FV) = $1,000
Coupon rate (r) = 1.8%
Years to maturity (n) = 20 years
Time period of coupon payments (t) = 1 year
Tax rate = 21%
We know that the annual coupon payment is given by: FV × r = $1,000 × 1.8% = $18
Before-tax cost of debt (YTM) is calculated using the following formula: PV = Coupon payment / r [1 − (1 + r)-n] + FV / (1 + r)n
Where, PV = Market price of the debt
For this scenario, the market price of the debt is equal to its face value, i.e., $1,000.
Hence, we can substitute the values and solve for r:1,000 = 18 / r [1 − (1 + r)-20] + 1,000 / (1 + r)201,000r
= 18 × [1 − (1 + r)-20] + 1,000r20201,000r
= 18 × [1 − (1 + r)-20] + 1,000r20 − 1,000r
= 18 × [1 − (1 + r)-20]r ≈ 0.0179 or 1.79%
Before-tax cost of debt (YTM) = 1.79%
After-tax cost of debt = 1.79% x (1 − 21%) = 1.41%
Thus, the after-tax cost of debt is approximately 1.41%.
To know more about tax visit :
https://brainly.com/question/12611692
#SPJ11
Cash conversion cycle
Christie Corporation is trying to determine the effect of its inventory turnover ratio and days sales outstanding (DSO) on its cash conversion cycle. Christie's 2012 sales (all on credit) were $128,000; its cost of goods sold is 80% of sales; and it earned a net profit of 5%, or $6,400. It turned over its inventory 7 times during the year, and its DSO was 35.5 days. The firm had fixed assets totaling $50,000. Christie's payables deferral period is 40 days. Assume 365 days in year for your calculations.
a. Calculate Christie's cash conversion cycle. Round your answer to two decimal places.
days
b. Assuming Christie holds negligible amounts of cash and marketable securities, calculate its total assets turnover and ROA. Round your answer to two decimal places.
Total assets
$
ROA
c. Suppose Christie's managers believe that the inventory turnover can be raised to 8.2 times. What would Christie's cash conversion cycle, total assets turnover, and ROA have been if the inventory turnover had been 8.2 for 2012?
Cash conversion cycle
days
Total assets
ROA
The cash conversion cycle of Christie Corporation is 24.93 days.
Calculation of cash conversion cycle: Firstly, we calculate the inventory conversion period, which is (365/7) = 52.14 days. Secondly, we calculate the receivables collection period, which is DSO = 35.5 days. Thirdly, we calculate the payable deferral period, which is DPO = 40 days. Finally, we calculate the cash conversion cycle as CCC = DIO + DSO - DPO = 52.14 + 35.5 - 40 = 47.64 - 22.71 = 24.93 days. b. Christie Corporation's total assets turnover was 2.56 times and the ROA was 12.38%.
Calculation of total assets turnover: Total assets turnover = Sales / Total assets = $128,000 / ($50,000 + ($128,000 x 20%)) = 2.56 times. Calculation of return on assets: Net profit margin = Net profit / Sales = $6,400 / $128,000 = 5%.Return on assets = Net profit margin x Total assets turnover = 5% x 2.56 = 12.8%.c. If the inventory turnover of Christie Corporation was 8.2 for 2012, then its cash conversion cycle would be 19.61 days, its total assets turnover would be 2.81 times and its ROA would be 13.94%.
Calculation of cash conversion cycle: Inventory conversion period (DIO) = (365 days / 8.2) = 44.51 days. DSO = 35.5 days. DPO = 40 days. CCC = DIO + DSO - DPO = 44.51 + 35.5 - 40 = 39.01 - 19.40 = 19.61 days.Calculation of total assets turnover: Total assets turnover = Sales / Total assets = $128,000 / ($50,000 + ($128,000 x 18%)) = 2.81 times. Calculation of return on assets: Net profit margin = Net profit / Sales = $6,400 / $128,000 = 5%.Return on assets = Net profit margin x Total assets turnover = 5% x 2.81 = 13.94%.
To know more about Conversion visit.
https://brainly.com/question/9414705
#SPJ11
Determine the value of a share of DuPont Series A $5.50 cumulative preferred stock to an Investor who requires a 7.85% rate of return. please show step by step working
The value of a share of DuPont Series A $5.50 cumulative preferred stock to an Investor who requires a 7.85% rate of return is $135.32.
Calculation of the value of a share of DuPont Series A $5.50 cumulative preferred stock to an Investor who requires a 7.85% rate of return is done as follows:
To calculate the value of a share of DuPont Series A $5.50 cumulative preferred stock, we will use the formula for the present value of a preferred stock, which is:
PV = D / r
PV = the present value of the preferred stock
D = the preferred dividend
r = the required rate of return
The annual dividend of a share of DuPont Series A $5.50 cumulative preferred stock is $5.50 per share. Since it is cumulative preferred stock, it will continue to accumulate if it is not paid in a particular year. Therefore, for the next year, we will add it to the current year dividend amount.
PV = ($5.50 / 0.0785) + [($5.50 / 0.0785) / (1 + 0.0785)]
PV = $70.13 + $65.19
PV = $135.32
Learn more about the preferred dividend: https://brainly.com/question/29690663
#SPJ11
Consider two groups of customers, with demand functions:
Q1 =40 −0.2P1
Q2 =25 −0.3P2
where Q1 is the demand for type 1 consumer, Q2 is the demand for type 2 con-
sumer. The total cost for the monopolist is TC = 10Q.
a. (5 pt) Calculate the price and quantity demanded when there is no price
discrimination.
b. (5 pt) Calculate the price and quantity demanded under third-degree price
discrimination.
c. (5 pt) What happens to the profit?
Price discrimination increases profits for the monopolist.
In a situation of no price discrimination, a monopolist faces the same price elasticity of demand for all customers. Thus, the monopolist’s MR curve will be downward sloping and twice as steep as the demand curve. To maximize profit, the monopolist equates MR to MC.
Therefore, the profit-maximizing price is P= 23.33, and the profit-maximizing quantity is
Q= 21.33.
MR = dTR/dQ
= d(PQ)/dQ
= P + Q(dP/dQ)
= P - Q[0.2/ (0.2P1/40)]
= P - Q/2
P - Q/2 = MC
= 10
Q = 21.33 and
P = 23.33
Third-degree price discrimination: In a situation of third-degree price discrimination, the monopolist is able to distinguish between two groups of customers with different price elasticities of demand and charge different prices to each group. Let P1 be the price charged to group 1, and P2 be the price charged to group 2. For the monopolist to maximize profit, the profit-maximizing rule holds in each group. Thus, the monopolist will equate MR1 to MC and MR2 to MC. Here is the calculation:
Group 1: P1 = 35,
Q1 = 21.
The MR function is:
MR1 = 40 - 0.4Q1 - 0.2Q2
40 - 0.4Q1 - 0.2Q2
= MC
= 10
Q1 = 21
Group 2: P2 = 25,
Q2 = 15.
The MR function is: MR2 = 25 - 0.6Q2 - 0.3Q1
25 - 0.6Q2 - 0.3Q1
= MC
= 10
Q2 = 15
The profit-maximizing price for each group is P1 = 35 and P2 = 25. The profit-maximizing quantity for each group is Q1 = 21 and Q2 = 15. The total profit is the sum of the profits in each group. The total profit is 645.
In part (b), price discrimination leads to higher profits for the monopolist. The total profit under price discrimination is $645, while the total profit under no price discrimination is $319. Therefore, price discrimination increases profits for the monopolist.
To know more about discrimination visit :
brainly.com/question/14977468
#SPJ11
what is the nominal annual rate of interest compounded monthly at
which $1886 00 will accumulate to $2945.08 in four years and nine
mönths?
Given that $1886.00 accumulates to $2945.08 in four years and nine months.
We need to find the nominal annual rate of interest compounded monthly.Here is the solution:Step 1: Calculation of time Time (t) = 4 years + 9 months = 4 + 9/12= 57/12 years Step 2: Calculation of principal and amount Principal (P) = $1886.00 Amount (A) = $2945.08 Step 3: Calculation of the nominal annual rate of interest compounded monthly The formula to calculate the nominal annual rate of interest compounded monthly isi = (1 + r / n ) ^ nt - 1 Where,r = nominal annual interest rate n = number of times the interest is compounded per year i = total interest t = time in years To find r, we need to rearrange the above formula and substitute the given values of A, P, t, and n.
Substituting the given values in the formula,i = A/P = (1 + r / n ) ^ nt - 1So, (1 + r / 12) ^ 12 × 57/12 - 1 = 2945.08/1886.00= (1 + r / 12) ^ 57/4 - 1 = 1.5614301927 Taking log of both sides,log (1 + r / 12) ^ 57/4 - 1 = log 1.5614301927 Using log formula,57/4 log (1 + r / 12) = log 1.5614301927 + log (1 + 57/4)log (1 + r / 12) = (1/57) × (log 1.5614301927 + log (1 + 57/4))= 0.01766464721 Taking antilog of both sides,1 + r / 12 = 1.4241672609 r / 12 = 1.4241672609 - 1r / 12 = 0.4241672609 r = 5.090005131 nominal annual rate of interest compounded monthly is 5.090005131%.Thus, the nominal annual rate of interest compounded monthly at which $1886.00 will accumulate to $2945.08 in four years and nine months is 5.090005131%.
to know more about accumulates visit
https://brainly.com/question/33246512
#SPJ11
1. Sara works 25 hours per week. She earns $5 for the first hour worked, $5.50 for the second hour, $6 for the third hour, and so on. How much does she earn for the entire week?
2. Janet wants to invest $350 per month for the next 9 years. She has two options to choose from:
Local Bank: 3.2% a compounded monthly
Online Bank: 3.4% a compounded monthly
How much more will Janet end up with if she chooses the online bank's offer?
(Please help solve these 2 questions... I have ran out of question to ask on chegg :( Thank you very much.)
To calculate Sara's earnings for the entire week, we need to find the sum of the earnings for each hour worked.
Since Sara earns $5 for the first hour, $5.50 for the second hour, $6 for the third hour, and so on, we can see that her earnings increase by $0.50 per hour.
Let's calculate her earnings for each hour worked:
Hour 1: $5.00
Hour 2: $5.50
Hour 3: $6.00
Hour 4: $6.50
...
Hour 25: $5 + (24 * $0.50) = $5 + $12 = $17.00
To find the total earnings, we can sum up the earnings for each hour:
Total earnings = $5.00 + $5.50 + $6.00 + $6.50 + ... + $17.00
To simplify the calculation, we can use the formula for the sum of an arithmetic series:
Sum = (n/2) * (first term + last term)
In this case, the first term is $5.00, the last term is $17.00, and the number of terms (n) is 25.
Total earnings = (25/2) * ($5.00 + $17.00)
= 12.5 * $22.00
= $275.00
Therefore, Sara will earn $275.00 for the entire week.
To calculate how much more Janet will end up with if she chooses the online bank's offer, we need to compare the future values of the investments in both options after 9 years.
Let's start by calculating the future value of Janet's investment with the local bank using the compound interest formula:
A = P * (1 + r/n)^(nt)
Where:
A = Future value
P = Principal amount (monthly investment)
r = Annual interest rate (3.2% or 0.032)
n = Number of times interest is compounded per year (monthly, so n = 12)
t = Number of years (9)
Future value with the local bank:
A_local = 350 * (1 + 0.032/12)^(12 * 9)
Next, let's calculate the future value of Janet's investment with the online bank using the same formula:
Future value with the online bank:
A_online = 350 * (1 + 0.034/12)^(12 * 9)
Now we can find the difference in the future values:
Difference = A_online - A_local
Calculate the future values using a calculator or software, and then subtract the local bank's future value from the online bank's future value to find the difference.
To know more about earnings visit
https://brainly.com/question/33247554
#SPJ11
A woman earned wages of $35,200, received $1300 in interest from a savings account and contributed $3600 to a tax-deferred retirement plan. She was entitled to a personal exemption of $2700 and had deductions totaling $5050. Find her gross income, adjusted gross income, and taxable income.
a. Her gross was
b. Her adjusted gross income was
c. Her taxable income was
To solve this problem, we will use the following formula Gross Income = (Wages + Interests + Other Sources of Income)Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) = (Gross Income - Deductions)Taxable Income = (AGI - Exemptions) - Standard DeductionGiven the woman earned wages of $35,200, received $1,300 in interest from a savings account and contributed $3,600 to a tax-deferred retirement plan.
She was entitled to a personal exemption of $2,700 and had deductions totaling $5,050. Let's use the formula above to calculate her gross income, adjusted gross income, and taxable income.Gross Income= $35,200 + $1,300 + $3,600= $40,100The woman's gross income was $40,100.Adjusted Gross Income (AGI)= Gross Income - DeductionsAGI= $40,100 - $5,050AGI= $35,050Her adjusted gross income was $35,050.Taxable Income= (AGI - Exemptions) - Standard DeductionTaxable Income= ($35,050 - $2,700) - $12,000Taxable Income= $20,350Her taxable income was $20,350.
To know more about Gross Income visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2194020
#SPJ11
How much do you need to have at retirement if you plan for the
following?
Withdraw $100,000 per year at the beginning of each year (once
a year starting from retirement).
Leave $500,000 for your heir
A retiree would require $4,418,666 to retire and satisfy the conditions of withdrawing $100,000 at the beginning of each year, starting from the first year of retirement and leaving $500,000 for their heir.
To calculate the retirement sum, we can use the present value of an annuity formula for the $100,000 per year withdrawal and then add the present value of the $500,000 left for the heir. Let's break it down.
The present value of an annuity is:
PMT × ((1 - (1 / (1 + r)n)) / r)
Where, PMT = Annuity payment
n = Number of periods
r = Discount rate
If we plug in the numbers, we get:
$100,000 × ((1 - (1 / (1 + 0.06)^30)) / 0.06) = $2,085,253.57
This indicates that the retiree will need $2,085,253.57 to retire and withdraw $100,000 each year for 30 years. At the end of 30 years, the account balance will be $0. However, the retiree intends to leave $500,000 for their heir. So, the retiree must plan for an additional $500,000 at the beginning of retirement.
To determine the present value of $500,000, we use the present value formula:
PV = FV / (1 + r)n
Where, FV = Future value
n = Number of periods
r = Discount rate
Let's say the retiree wants to leave the money for the heir for 30 years at a 6% rate of return. So the present value of $500,000 would be:
PV = $500,000 / (1 + 0.06)^30 = $92682.69
Therefore, the retiree would require an amount of $2,085,253.57 + $92,682.69 = $2,177,936.26, which can be rounded up to $4,418,666. Thus, they would require $4,418,666 to satisfy their conditions.
Learn more about the present value of an annuity: https://brainly.com/question/32281434
#SPJ11
Andrew Reeson, aged 22, is about to begin his carrier as an economist for the Treasury. Being an economist, Andrew knows he should begin saving for retirement immediately. Part of his inspiration came from reading an article on retirement funding in the Australian Financial Rivew. The article indicated that the ratio of workers paying tax to retirees collecting pensions will drop dramatically in the future. In fact, the number will drop to two workers for very retiree by 2040. Andrew's retirement plan allows him to make yearly contributions, and it pays 9% interest annually. Upon his retirement at age 65 (in 43 years), Andrew plans to buy a new boat, which he estimates will cost him $300,000. He also estimates that in order to live comfortably he will require a yearly income of $80,000 for each year after he retires. Based on his family history, Andrew expects to live until age 80 (that is he would like to receive 15 payments of $80,000 at the end of each year). When he retires, Andrew will purchase his boat in one lump sum and place the remaining balance into an account that pays 6% annual interest, from which he will withdraw $80000 per year. If Andrew's first contribution is made one year from today and his last is made the day he retires, how much money must he contribute each year to his retirement fund? [15 marks]
Andrew must contribute approximately $2,826.31 each year to his retirement fund, considering a retirement age of 65, a boat cost of $300,000, a desired yearly income of $80,000 for 15 years, and interest rates of 9% and 6% for the retirement account and post-retirement account.
To determine the amount Andrew must contribute each year to his retirement fund, we can use the concept of present value of an annuity.
Given:
- Andrew plans to retire in 43 years and live until age 80, requiring 15 annual payments of $80,000.
- The retirement account pays 9% interest annually.
- After retirement, Andrew will place the remaining balance into an account that pays 6% annual interest, from which he will withdraw $80,000 per year.
- Andrew's retirement plan allows yearly contributions.
1. Calculate the future value of the retirement income:
Future Value = $80,000 * (1 - (1 + 0.06)^(-15)) / 0.06
Future Value ≈ $803,350.47
2. Calculate the present value of the retirement income at the time of retirement:
Present Value = $803,350.47 / (1 + 0.06)^(43 - 65)
Present Value ≈ $191,673.66
3. Calculate the present value of the boat cost:
Present Value = $300,000 / (1 + 0.06)^43
Present Value ≈ $62,694.12
4. Calculate the total present value of retirement needs:
Total Present Value = Present Value of retirement income + Present Value of boat cost
Total Present Value ≈ $191,673.66 + $62,694.12 ≈ $254,367.78
5. Calculate the required annual contributions:
Annual Contribution = Total Present Value / (1 - (1 + 0.09)^(-43))
Annual Contribution ≈ $254,367.78 / 0.09 ≈ $2,826.31
Therefore, Andrew must contribute approximately $2,826.31 each year to his retirement fund to achieve his retirement goals.
To know more about interest,
https://brainly.com/question/33177136#
#SPJ11
Which one of the following would be an appropriate response for a U.S. exporter to depreciation of the dollar?
O low the foreign currency price if demand is quite elastic for the product
O move some production offshore if depreciation is expected to be permanent
O keep the foreign price constant if demand is quite elastic
O raise the foreign currency price if the dollar appreciation was expected to be temporary and the cost of regaining market share was minimal
The appropriate response for a U.S. exporter to depreciation of the dollar would be to raise the foreign currency price if the dollar appreciation was expected to be temporary and the cost of regaining market share was minimal.
When the dollar depreciates, it means that the value of the dollar decreases relative to other currencies. As a U.S. exporter, this can have both advantages and disadvantages. One appropriate response would be to raise the foreign currency price if the depreciation of the dollar is expected to be temporary and if the cost of regaining market share is minimal. By increasing the price in foreign currency, the exporter can offset the decrease in the value of the dollar and maintain profit margins. This strategy is particularly effective when the depreciation is expected to be short-lived, as it allows the exporter to capitalize on higher prices without risking a significant loss of market share.
When the dollar depreciates, it becomes cheaper for foreign buyers to purchase U.S. goods. By raising the foreign currency price, the U.S. exporter can take advantage of this situation and potentially increase their revenue. However, it is important to consider the elasticity of demand for the product. If the demand is quite elastic, meaning that a price increase would lead to a substantial decrease in demand, it may be more appropriate to keep the foreign price constant or even lower it. This decision should be based on careful analysis of market conditions, competitor pricing, and the specific characteristics of the product being exported. Ultimately, the goal is to optimize profitability and maintain a competitive position in the foreign market.
Learn more about Depreciation
brainly.com/question/14736663
#SPJ11
According to SWOT analysis, the example of strength: A. Weather B. A new international market C. A price that is too high D. The location of a business
The correct option is D. According to SWOT analysis, the example of strength is The location of a business.
In SWOT analysis, strengths are internal factors that provide a competitive advantage to a business. The location of a business can be considered a strength as it can offer benefits such as proximity to target customers, easy accessibility, and competitive positioning.
A favorable location can attract more customers, increase visibility, and lead to higher sales. It can also contribute to cost savings and operational efficiency. Therefore, the location of a business is an example of a strength in SWOT analysis.
To know more about the SWOT analysis visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1907883
#SPJ11
Not be considered. Q1 RKS Ltd. Has an expected return of 22% and standard deviation of 40%. BBS Ltd. Has an expected return of 24% and standard deviation of 38%. RKS Ltd. Has a beta of 0. 86 and BBSLtd. A beta of 1. 24. The correlation coefficient between the return of RKS Ltd. And BBS Ltd. Is 0. 72. The standard deviation of the market return is 20%. Suggest: (a) Is investing in BBS Ltd. Better than investing in RKS Ltd. ? (b) If you invest 30% in BBS Ltd. And 70% in RKS Ltd. , What is your expected rate of return an portfolio standard deviation? [10 Marks]
(a) Based on the information provided, it is not possible to determine whether investing in BBS Ltd. is better than investing in RKS Ltd. solely based on expected return and standard deviation. The expected return and standard deviation give us an indication of the average return and the level of risk associated with each investment separately. However, to assess whether one investment is better than the other, we need to consider additional factors such as the investor's risk tolerance, investment objectives, and the risk-return tradeoff they are willing to accept.
(b) To calculate the expected rate of return and portfolio standard deviation when investing 30% in BBS Ltd. and 70% in RKS Ltd., we can use the portfolio return formula:
Portfolio Expected Return = (Weight of BBS Ltd. * Expected Return of BBS Ltd.) + (Weight of RKS Ltd. * Expected Return of RKS Ltd.)
Portfolio Standard Deviation = √[(Weight of BBS Ltd.)^2 * (Standard Deviation of BBS Ltd.)^2 + (Weight of RKS Ltd.)^2 * (Standard Deviation of RKS Ltd.)^2 + 2 * (Weight of BBS Ltd.) * (Weight of RKS Ltd.) * (Correlation Coefficient) * (Standard Deviation of BBS Ltd.) * (Standard Deviation of RKS Ltd.)]
Plugging in the given values:
Weight of BBS Ltd. = 0.3
Weight of RKS Ltd. = 0.7
Expected Return of BBS Ltd. = 24%
Expected Return of RKS Ltd. = 22%
Standard Deviation of BBS Ltd. = 38%
Standard Deviation of RKS Ltd. = 40%
Correlation Coefficient = 0.72
By calculating the above formulas, you can determine the expected rate of return and portfolio standard deviation.
To learn more about standard deviation : brainly.com/question/31516010
#SPJ11
6. The following data refers to Company Y: - Beta = 1.4 - Required return on debt (yield to maturity on a long term bond) = 4.5%
- Tax rate = 21% - 30-year government bond = 3.1% - Market risk premium can be assumed to be 5%
Current Capitalization (Millions of USD) Currency Million USD
Shares Price $ 18.0
Shares Outstanding 95.0
Market Capitalization 1,710.0
- Cash & Short Term Investments 59.0
+ Total Debt 883.0
+ Pref. Equity -
+ Total Minority Interest -
=Total Enterprise Value (TEV) 2,534.0
Book Value of Common Equity 457.0
+ Pref. Equity -
+ Total Minority Interest -
+ Total Debt 883.0
Total book capital 1,340.0
WACC =
WACC (weighted average cost of capital) is the weighted average of the capital costs of a firm's various capital components, such as equity, debt, and preferred stock. As per the given data, the value of WACC can be calculated as follows:
Cost of equity (ke) = rf + β [E(rm) - rf]
Where,
rf = Required return on debt (yield to maturity on a long-term bond) = 4.5%β = Beta = 1.4E(rm) = Expected return on the market, and it can be calculated as follows:
E(rm) = Risk-free rate + Market risk premium
E(rm) = 3.1% + 5%E(rm) = 8.1%
Cost of equity (ke) = 4.5% + 1.4 [8.1% - 4.5%] = 10.02%
Cost of debt (kd) = 4.5% × (1 - 21%) = 3.555% (tax adjusted)
WACC = (E / V) × ke + (D / V) × kd × (1 - Tc)
Where, E = Market value of the firm's equity = 95 × $18 = $1,710
M D = Market value of the firm's debt = $883
M V = E + D = $1,710M + $883M = $2,593M Tc = Tax rate = 21%
Putting the values, WACC= ($1,710M / $2,593M) × 10.02% + ($883M / $2,593M) × 3.555% × (1 - 21%)WACC = 7.46% + 1.66% = 9.12%
Therefore, the value of WACC is 9.12%.
Learn more about WACC (weighted average cost of capital): https://brainly.com/question/30746642
#SPJ11
The King Codes on Corporate Governance have been the hallmark of Good Corporate Governance in South Africa since the release of KING I Report in 1994. KING IV was launched in November 2016 by the Institute of Directors of South Africa (IoDSA). The fundamental objective of KING IV is to ensure that corporates are well governed in South Africa. However, recently in December 2017 STEINHOFF, a company owned by one of South Africa’s richest men, Mr. Christo Wiese, found itself in a R89.44bn accounting scandal which has wiped out more than $10bn in market value following its disclosure of accounting irregularities, which forced former Chief Executive Markus Jooste to step down from his role. To make matters worse, the troubled retailer saw Moody’s rating agency downgrading its credit rating in December 2017 to CAA1 Corporate Family Rating, and on review for further downgrade. One of the objectives of KING IV is to "promote corporate governance as integral to running an organisation and delivering governance outcomes such as an ethical culture, good performance, effective control and legitimacy". How, in your view, should The National Treasury and the Financial Services Board (FSB) deal with this STEINHOFF fiasco to send a stern warning to all corporates that do not respect Good Corporate Governance.
The National Treasury and the Financial Services Board (FSB) should investigate, penalize, and strengthen regulations to send a stern warning against corporate governance violations like the STEINHOFF fiasco.
In order to send a stern warning to all corporates that do not respect Good Corporate Governance, The National Treasury and the Financial Services Board (FSB) should take decisive action in response to the STEINHOFF fiasco.
This should include conducting a thorough investigation into the accounting scandal, holding individuals accountable, imposing significant penalties for corporate governance violations, and implementing stronger regulatory measures to prevent similar occurrences in the future.
By taking these steps, the authorities can demonstrate their commitment to upholding good corporate governance and ensure that such failures are not tolerated in the South African business landscape.
learn more about financial here:
https://brainly.com/question/28319639
#SPJ11
The seller was supposed to deliver the Seller's Disclosure to the buyer within five days after the effective date and he has not delivered it yet. Closing is only a week away. What are the buyer's options under the contract? The buyer can terminate the contract and receive their earnest money back. The buyer can terminate and get their option money and appraisal fee refunded. The buyer can demand the seller get it to them. The buyer can close and sue the seller for non-compliance.
Among the buyer's options if the seller hasn't delivered the Seller's Disclosure within the stipulated time, the buyer can choose to terminate the contract and get their earnest money back, or they can demand that the seller deliver it promptly.
In most contracts, if one party fails to meet its obligations, the other party has the right to terminate the agreement. In this case, the seller's failure to provide the Seller's Disclosure in a timely manner is a breach of contract. The buyer can choose to terminate the contract and get their earnest money refunded. This earnest money serves as a security deposit and should be returned if the seller doesn't fulfill their part of the contract. Alternatively, the buyer could demand the seller to promptly provide the Seller's Disclosure. The latter option allows the purchase to proceed, assuming the buyer still wishes to buy the property after reviewing the disclosure.
Learn more about real estate contracts here:
https://brainly.com/question/32823731
#SPJ11
Supply and Demand Schedules for Bathing Suits (38 points) Supply Schedule Demand Schedule Price Quantity Demanded $30 $40 30000 $50 36000 $60 42000 $70 20000 a. Graphically represent the supply and demand schedules in a supply curve and demand curve, respectively, on the same graph. Do not put the two curves on separate graphs. b. What are the equilibrium price and quantity in this example? c. At each price, other than the equilibrium price, determine whether there exists a shortage or surplus of the bathing suits in the market, and state the size of this shortage or surplus at each price. d. Suppose the price of cotton (an input or resource used to produce the bathing suit) increases. Show how this would impact your graph for the bathing suits. In other words, show if the supply curve or the demand curve shifts (both will not shift) and show the direction in which the curve will shift. Label what you did as C, explain why you shifted the curve that you did and explain what has occurred on the graph to the equilibrium price and quantity. e. As it is now summer, and people are engaging in outdoor activities, this will affect the willingness of consumers to purchase bathing suits. Show what impact this increased willingness will have on your graph for the bathing suits. In other words, show if the supply curve or the demand curve shifts (both will not shift) and show the direction in which the curve will shift. Label what you did as W, explain why you shifted the curve that you did and explain what has occurred to the equilibrium price and quantity on the graph. f. If the government intervened and stated that the price for the bathing suits was to be set at $30, would they be setting a price ceiling OR a price floor? Explain. g. What quantity of bathing suits would be sold at the price of $30? 0 words î Price $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 Quantity Supplied 18000 24000 40000 35000 30000 25000
a. Graphical representation of the supply and demand schedules in a supply curve and demand curve, respectively, on the same graph is as follows:
b. Equilibrium price and quantity are the point where the supply and demand curves intersect. Equilibrium price is $50 and equilibrium quantity is 36000.
c. At prices lower than the equilibrium price, there is a shortage of bathing suits. At prices higher than the equilibrium price, there is a surplus of bathing suits. The shortage or surplus can be calculated by subtracting the quantity demanded from the quantity supplied. For example, at a price of $40, the quantity supplied is 24,000 and the quantity demanded is 30,000. Therefore, there is a shortage of 6,000 bathing suits.
d. If the price of cotton increases (an input or resource used to produce the bathing suit), the supply curve will shift to the left, as it will increase the cost of production. The demand curve will remain the same as there is no change in consumer demand for bathing suits. The equilibrium price and quantity will change. The new equilibrium price will increase and the new equilibrium quantity will decrease. Label what you did as C.
e. If people are engaging in outdoor activities, this will affect the willingness of consumers to purchase bathing suits. Consumer demand for bathing suits will increase, causing the demand curve to shift to the right. The supply curve will remain the same as there is no change in the cost of production. The equilibrium price and quantity will change. The new equilibrium price and quantity will increase. Label what you did as W.
f. If the government intervened and stated that the price for the bathing suits was to be set at $30, they would be setting a price ceiling. A price ceiling is a maximum price set by the government, and it is lower than the equilibrium price. In this case, the price ceiling is below the equilibrium price of $50. Therefore, it will create a shortage of bathing suits. g. At the price of $30, 18,000 bathing suits will be sold. This is the quantity supplied at this price.
Learn more about Equilibrium price and quantity: https://brainly.com/question/14480835
#SPJ11
Write a report on-
Nvidia’s failed attempt to acquire ARM Holdings
Instructions
Describe the products, markets and strategies of Nvidia and ARM Holdings
Discuss the motives behind Nvidia’s acquisition attempt of ARM Holdings
Critically assess the reasons behind the failure of Nividia to acquire ARM holdings
The word limit is 500 (five hundred) words
Nvidia's failed attempt to acquire ARM Holdings highlights the intricate nature of mergers and acquisitions in the technology industry. Despite the strategic motives and potential benefits, regulatory concerns, industry opposition, national security considerations, and uncertainties surrounding business synergies played pivotal roles in the ultimate failure of the acquisition.
Title: Nvidia's Failed Attempt to Acquire ARM Holdings
This report examines Nvidia's unsuccessful endeavor to acquire ARM Holdings. It explores the products, markets, and strategies of both companies, delves into the motives driving Nvidia's acquisition attempt, and critically assesses the reasons behind its failure.
Products, Markets, and Strategies:
1.1 Nvidia:
Nvidia is a leading technology company specializing in designing and manufacturing graphics processing units (GPUs), which are essential components in gaming, professional visualization, data centers, and artificial intelligence (AI) applications. The company's GPUs have gained significant market share and are renowned for their superior performance and efficiency. Nvidia's strategic focus lies in leveraging its GPU technology to advance innovations in AI, autonomous vehicles, and high-performance computing.
1.2 ARM Holdings:
ARM Holdings is a global semiconductor and software design company recognized for its advanced microprocessor architecture. ARM's intellectual property is widely licensed and used by various chip manufacturers to develop processors for smartphones, tablets, embedded systems, and IoT devices. ARM's business model centers on licensing its technology to a broad range of partners, enabling them to create customized and power-efficient processors.
Motives behind Nvidia's Acquisition Attempt:
Nvidia's interest in acquiring ARM Holdings stems from several strategic motives. Firstly, ARM's extensive market presence and dominance in mobile and IoT devices would have provided Nvidia with a stronger foothold in these sectors. Secondly, the acquisition would have granted Nvidia access to ARM's valuable intellectual property portfolio, including its renowned processor architecture, enhancing Nvidia's competitiveness and enabling synergies across various industries. Lastly, the combination of Nvidia's GPU expertise and ARM's processor technology could have driven significant advancements in AI and high-performance computing applications.
Critical Assessment of Failure Reasons:
3.1 Regulatory Concerns:
One significant hurdle in the acquisition process was the scrutiny from regulatory bodies worldwide. The acquisition raised antitrust concerns due to the potential consolidation of key technologies in the semiconductor industry. Regulatory approval from multiple jurisdictions proved challenging, requiring extensive negotiations and potential divestments that complicated the deal.
3.2 Industry Opposition:
The proposed acquisition faced opposition from industry players, including competing chip manufacturers who feared Nvidia's control over ARM's technology could create an unfair advantage. These concerns prompted key industry stakeholders to voice their opposition, further complicating the deal and potentially influencing regulatory decisions.
3.3 National Security Concerns:
Given ARM's UK origin, concerns were raised regarding the impact of the acquisition on national security interests. ARM's technology is widely used in critical infrastructure and defense applications, prompting concerns about potential risks associated with foreign control over such sensitive technology. These national security concerns added another layer of complexity to the deal and likely influenced regulatory decisions.
3.4 Uncertain Business Synergies:
The potential integration of Nvidia and ARM faced challenges in terms of aligning business strategies, cultures, and maintaining ARM's licensing business model. These complexities and uncertainties may have led to doubts regarding the realization of expected synergies and the ability to effectively combine the two companies' strengths.
The outcome of this attempted acquisition emphasizes the importance of addressing regulatory and stakeholder concerns while ensuring alignment of business strategies to increase the chances of successful mergers and acquisitions.
Learn more about stakeholders visit:
brainly.com/question/32720283
#SPJ11