Answer:
During WWI, many jobs were left vacant because men left to fight the war. In order to keep these industries running, the jobs were often taken by women. This was unusual at the time, and it gave them a taste of independence. When the war was over, many of them were not happy to return to their previous position as housekeepers. They wanted to remain involved in the public sphere and the running of the country. One of the ways to achieve this was by winning the right to vote. Their role during the war also helped them demonstrate their abilities to contribute as members of society.
Explanation:
How do we remember Nero? What is Nero remembered for?
Answer:
Nero, the Roman Emperor, is primarily remembered for his tyrannical and extravagant reign. Here are some key aspects for which Nero is commonly remembered:
Persecution of Christians: Nero is infamous for his persecution of Christians, particularly after the Great Fire of Rome in 64 AD. He blamed Christians for the fire and subjected them to cruel and brutal punishments.
Excessive and extravagant lifestyle: Nero was known for his lavish lifestyle, indulging in extravagant parties, building projects, and grand performances. He had a passion for arts and music, often performing on stage himself.
Political and familial intrigue: Nero's reign was marked by political instability and conflicts within his own family. He ordered the execution of several family members, including his mother, Agrippina, and his wife, Octavia, to secure his power.
The Great Fire of Rome: Although Nero blamed Christians for the fire, there is speculation that he may have played a role in it himself to clear space for his ambitious building projects. Regardless of the cause, the fire devastated a significant portion of Rome.
Economic mismanagement and financial extravagance: Nero's excessive spending and mismanagement of finances contributed to economic troubles during his reign, leading to heavy taxation and burdens on the Roman citizens.
Explanation:
Use the opinion of Mercantilist, Physiocrats and Socialist on the importance of government intervention in the economy
Mercantilists advocate for government intervention to promote national wealth, Physiocrats emphasize minimal government interference, and Socialists support extensive government intervention for economic equality.
Mercantilists believe that government intervention is crucial for promoting economic prosperity.
They advocate for policies such as protectionism, export promotion, and accumulation of wealth through trade surpluses. Mercantilists argue that the government should regulate and control economic activities to maximize national wealth and power.Physiocrats, on the other hand, advocate for minimal government intervention in the economy.
They believe in the concept of laissez-faire, emphasizing the importance of natural economic laws and the free operation of markets. Physiocrats argue that the government's role should be limited to protecting property rights and ensuring a stable legal framework, allowing for the efficient functioning of agricultural activities.Socialists, however, view government intervention as essential for achieving economic equality and social justice.
They believe that the government should play a central role in planning and directing the economy, redistributing wealth, and providing public goods and services. Socialists argue that government intervention is necessary to address inequality, ensure workers' rights, and promote collective welfare.In summary, while mercantilists emphasize government intervention for national wealth, physiocrats advocate for minimal government interference, and socialists believe in extensive government intervention to achieve economic equality and social welfare.
For more questions on government intervention
https://brainly.com/question/32990533
#SPJ8
Choose the best word or phrase from the drop-down boxes to complete each sentence. In 1957, President Dwight D. Eisenhower took control of the to allow African American students to attend high school. Th of 1957. It gave the Department of Justice the power to stop Alabama Americans to Under the Indian Terminatio reservations and relocate to urban areas, where they often f they would into American culture. Virginia Arkansas e C 8 Oll Submit C hp M O Z National Guard and ordered the troops senhower signed the Civil Rights Act made it difficult for African O in Indians were encouraged to leave ion. The federal government hoped Jun 22 1:49 1 US
In 1957, President Dwight D. Eisenhower took control of the National Guard to allow African American students to attend high school.
This action was in response to the Little Rock Nine crisis in Little Rock, Arkansas, where nine African American students were denied entry to a previously all-white school. By deploying the National Guard, Eisenhower enforced federal law and ensured the protection and equal rights of African American students.
Additionally, President Eisenhower signed the Civil Rights Act of 1957. This legislation aimed to address voting rights issues and provided the Department of Justice with the power to intervene in cases where individuals' constitutional rights were being violated. The act played a significant role in the broader civil rights movement and demonstrated the federal government's commitment to upholding equal rights for all Americans.
The overall goal of these actions was to promote racial integration and equality in the United States. Eisenhower's involvement and the signing of the Civil Rights Act were pivotal moments in the fight for civil rights and set the stage for further advancements in desegregation and equal treatment under the law.
For more such question on Dwight D. Eisenhower
https://brainly.com/question/1262961
#SPJ8
Answer:
see image
Explanation:
Question 6 (1 point)
As the Earth rotates, circulating air is deflected. Instead of circulating in a straight
pattern, the air deflects toward the right in the Northern Hemisphere and toward the
left in the Southern Hemisphere, resulting in curved paths. This deflection is called
the:
orographic effect
orographic lifting
coriolis effect
atmospheric pressure
The deflection caused in the air due to the rotation of the Earth is called the Coriolis effect. Thus, option C is the answer.
The Coriolis effect is a phenomenon that occurs due to the Earth's rotation. This effect describes the deflection that happens in an object which is moving in a rotating system such as the Earth's surface. The Coriolis effect has been applied in many fields like meteorology, oceanography, and navigation.
The Coriolis effect can be most seen in objects such as large-scale weather systems. Air currents, for example, appear to bend to the right in the Northern Hemisphere while air currents behave in the opposite way in the Southern Hemisphere where it bends to the left.
Thus, the apparent deflection seen in the circulating air is known as the Coriolis effect.
Learn more about the Coriolis effect, here:
https://brainly.com/question/21826324
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
The picture depicts a service provided through a
that
The image shows a service made possible by a regulatory rule. In order to assist promote a fair and effective market, governments set limits on enterprises.
The government must step in, for instance, to ensure competitive trade practises (an efficiency objective) and to safeguard disadvantaged parties in financial relationships since the regulatory policy is intended to accomplish efficiency and equity (an equity goal).
Limits on environmental pollution, laws prohibiting child labour or other forms of forced labour, minimum wage laws, rules requiring accurate ingredient disclosure on food and drug labels, and rules establishing minimal testing requirements for food and drugs are just a few examples of common regulations.
Learn more about regulatory policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/30103372
Although part of your
question is missing, you might be referring to this full
question: Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
The picture depicts a service provided through a
regulatory policy
constituent policy
redistributive policy
distributive policy
What do historian call a source of historical information created interpretation of other source of historical evidence?
Answer:
Secondary sources are articles, books, and other documents that interpret, summarize, or critique the evidence surrounding a historic event. For example: A book written by a historian is a secondary source.
Viewers of Manet’s Déjeuner sur l’herbe initially responded to its public display by attacking the canvas with their umbrellas. Why?
Answer:
The viewers of Édouard Manet's painting "Déjeuner sur l'herbe" initially responded by attacking the canvas with their umbrellas due to the painting's controversial subject matter and departure from traditional artistic conventions.
The painting, completed in 1863, depicts a n*de woman in a picnic setting with two fully dressed men. This subject matter challenged the societal norms and expectations of the time, which considered ndity in art acceptable only in certain historical or mythological contexts.
The viewers, who were accustomed to more traditional and idealized representations in art, found Manet's depiction shocking and offensive. The realistic portrayal of a nde woman in a contemporary setting went against the established artistic conventions of the period. The viewers felt a sense of moral outrage and considered the painting to be indecent and scandalous.
Their reaction, attacking the canvas with their umbrellas, was a physical manifestation of their disapproval and an attempt to censor the artwork. It was a direct response to what they perceived as a violation of moral standards and a challenge to the established artistic norms.
Over time, Manet's painting and the controversy surrounding it became an important moment in the development of modern art, as it challenged the traditional notions of subject matter and paved the way for new artistic movements. However, the initial hostile reaction reflects the conservative attitudes prevalent at the time and the resistance to change in the art world.
Explanation:
Under the administrations of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, federal authority was?
The administrations of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, federal authority was characterized by a commitment to limited government, strict interpretation of the Constitution, and a focus on protecting states' rights and individual liberties.
Under the administrations of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, federal authority was characterized by a commitment to limited government and strict interpretation of the Constitution.
Both Jefferson and Madison, who were prominent figures of the Democratic-Republican Party, believed in decentralized power and sought to protect individual liberties and states' rights.
Thomas Jefferson, who served as the third president of the United States from 1801 to 1809, championed the idea of a small federal government. He advocated for a strict interpretation of the Constitution, emphasizing that the federal government should only exercise powers explicitly granted to it by the Constitution.
Jefferson sought to reduce the size and scope of the federal government, including scaling back the military, reducing the national debt, and repealing the Alien and Sedition Acts.
James Madison, the fourth president of the United States from 1809 to 1817, shared Jefferson's views on limited government and strict interpretation.
Madison is often referred to as the "Father of the Constitution" for his instrumental role in drafting the document.
During his presidency, Madison continued to prioritize a restrained federal government.
He maintained a commitment to states' rights and was cautious of federal overreach.
Both Jefferson and Madison opposed the broad exercise of federal power and were wary of centralization.
They believed that the states should retain significant authority and that the federal government should only possess limited powers as outlined in the Constitution.
This philosophy influenced their policy decisions, including their approach to issues such as internal improvements, taxation, and the protection of individual rights.
Their vision aimed to strike a balance between a functioning federal government and the preservation of individual and state sovereignty.
For similar questions on federal authority
https://brainly.com/question/860014
#SPJ8
The administrations of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, federal authority was characterized by a commitment to limited government, strict interpretation of the Constitution, and a focus on protecting states' rights and individual liberties.
Under the administrations of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, federal authority was characterized by a commitment to limited government and strict interpretation of the Constitution.
Both Jefferson and Madison, who were prominent figures of the Democratic-Republican Party, believed in decentralized power and sought to protect individual liberties and states' rights.
Thomas Jefferson, who served as the third president of the United States from 1801 to 1809, championed the idea of a small federal government.
He advocated for a strict interpretation of the Constitution, emphasizing that the federal government should only exercise powers explicitly granted to it by the Constitution.
Jefferson sought to reduce the size and scope of the federal government, including scaling back the military, reducing the national debt, and repealing the Alien and Sedition Acts.
James Madison, the fourth president of the United States from 1809 to 1817, shared Jefferson's views on limited government and strict interpretation.
Madison is often referred to as the "Father of the Constitution" for his instrumental role in drafting the document.
During his presidency, Madison continued to prioritize a restrained federal government.
He maintained a commitment to states' rights and was cautious of federal overreach.
Both Jefferson and Madison opposed the broad exercise of federal power and were wary of centralization.
They believed that the states should retain significant authority and that the federal government should only possess limited powers as outlined in the Constitution.
This philosophy influenced their policy decisions, including their approach to issues such as internal improvements, taxation, and the protection of individual rights.
Their vision aimed to strike a balance between a functioning federal government and the preservation of individual and state sovereignty.
For similar questions on federal authority
brainly.com/question/860014
#SPJ8
Common Sense by Thomas Paine is an important work because it: 1. helped Americans reconcile their differences with England 2. supported the concept of the English constitution 3. argued that Parliament, not the King, was the enemy of the colonies 4. persuaded many Americans that no reconciliation with Britain was possible
Answer:
4. persuaded many Americans that no reconciliation with Britain was possible
Explanation:
The pamphlet argued for American independence from Britain and criticized the arbitrary rule of King George III and his Parliament. It also proposed a democratic republic of free and equal citizens and reflected on the general principles of government and religion. It was written in clear and persuasive prose that appealed to the common people in the colonies. It helped inspire rebel leaders to declare American independence six months later.
Answer:
The correct answer is option 4: persuaded many Americans that no reconciliation with Britain was possible.
Explanation:
Common Sense by Thomas Paine, published in 1776, was a political pamphlet arguing for American independence from Britain. It was written in a clear and persuasive style, and it helped convince many skeptical colonists that a complete break with the mother country was necessary. The major arguments in Common Sense were:
Monarchy is an outdated form of government, and republicanism is better suited for the new American nation.The large distance between America and Britain, as well as their different interests, make true unity impossible.Parliament had violated the political and economic rights of the colonists, making reconciliation unlikely.Paine's arguments in Common Sense appealed to many Americans and helped build support for declaring independence from Britain. The pamphlet was enormously influential in persuading people that no compromise with Britain was possible and that a complete separation was necessary.
The other answer choices are incorrect because Common Sense did not focus on reconciling with Britain (option 1), supporting the English constitution (option 2), or arguing Parliament was America's sole enemy (option 3). Rather, Paine argued that an independent America, with its own republican government, was the best course of action.
The Final Solution was Nazi Germany's plan to O physically exterminate all Jewish people in Europe. O control all of Europe. • bovcott Jewish businesses. • boycott the League of Nations.
The 'Final Solution' was the Nazi plan to exterminate all Jewish people in Europe, an event now known as the Holocaust. It was a state-sanctioned genocide involving concentration and death camps. This plan came to fruition due to the deep-seated anti-Semitic sentiments which were fuelled by Nazi propaganda and the dehumanization of Jewish people.
Explanation:The Final Solution was the Nazi Germany's plan to exterminate all Jewish people in Europe, developed at the Wannsee Conference by senior bureaucrats. It was the systematic and state-sanctioned murder of around six million Jewish people and at least three million members of other minority groups. It involved working them to death, starving them or exterminating them directly. Jewish people were persecuted and sent to concentration and extermination camps.
Anti-Jewish sentiment was a deep-rooted issue in Europe, further fuelled by Nazi propaganda in the years leading up to the Holocaust. The association of Jewish people with social and economic problems and depiction as 'vermin' were used to justify their treatment. This campaign of dehumanization made it easier for the mass execution to be accepted by German society.
Concentration camps became both labor and death camps, with conditions worsening as the years went on. Those unfit for work were usually sent almost directly to the gas chambers upon arrival. There were tens of thousands of people involved from across Europe in the systematic implementation of these atrocities, resulting in this world-shattering genocide.
Learn more about Final Solution here:https://brainly.com/question/32854837
#SPJ1
The Final Solution was Nazi Germany's plan, agreed upon at the Wannsee Conference, to systematically exterminate all Jews and other targeted minorities in Europe during World War II. This horrific plan depended on a network of concentration and extermination camps, anti-Jewish laws, and widespread collaboration across Europe.
Explanation:The Final Solution was the term for Nazi Germany's plan to exterminate all Jewish people in Europe during World War II. This decision, reached at the Wannsee Conference in January 1942, set in motion the systematic murder of six million Jews and at least three million members of other minority groups. The plan involved persecution of Jews in place, their deportation to concentration and extermination camps, and their systematic murder via forced labor, starvation, and gassing.
Following Hitler's rise to power, anti-Jewish laws and propaganda were introduced, leading to increasingly severe persecution of Jews. Hitler's vision of a racially pure German state, the Third Reich, considered Jews - along with other minorities like the Roma, homosexuals, and political dissidents - as threats requiring elimination. Concentration camps, such as Dachau, were established as early as 1933, and six extermination camps were built between 1941 and 1945 on Polish territory.
Upon arrival at these camps, many victims were immediately sent to the so-called 'showers' - gas chambers designed for mass murder. The systematic execution of this horrific plan required the collaboration of tens of thousands of people across Europe. The atrocities were finally brought to an end when Allied troops advanced and liberated the camps, leading to the eventual defeat of Nazi Germany.
Learn more about Final Solution here:https://brainly.com/question/23956784
#SPJ2
T/F? Most countries agreed with the United States and its actions concerning Vietnam.
Most countries agreed with the United States and its actions concerning Vietnam: False.
What is the Vietnam War?The Vietnam War is sometimes referred to as the Vietnam conflict or the Second Indochina War and it is a short, costly, protracted and divisive conflict between the communist government of North Vietnam and South Vietnam, which ended on the 30th of April, 1975.
Generally speaking, the United states of America provided a significant level of support to anti-communists during the conflicts that occurred in Turkey, Greece, Korea, and Vietnam (Vietnam War).
In conclusion, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that the actions of the United states of America with respect to Vietnam were not endorsed by most countries.
Read more on Vietnam War here: brainly.com/question/12918391
#SPJ1
False, not most countries agreed with the United States and its actions concerning Vietnam. It was a divisive issue and while some countries supported it, many other countries opposed the American involvement.
Explanation:False, it is not correct to say that most countries agreed with the United States and its actions concerning Vietnam. During the Vietnam War, it was a divisive issue internationally. Some allied countries supported the U.S.'s intervention due to the principles of containment and the domino theory. However, many others, especially those in the 'Non-aligned Movement,' opposed the American involvement. They viewed it as an act of imperialism, and a violation of Vietnam's right to self-determination.
Learn more about Vietnam War here:https://brainly.com/question/11375126
#SPJ1
What industry did the Pullman
strike affect?
A. Agriculture
B. Railroad
C. Textile
D. Auto
Answer.
Railroad
railroad is the right answer
Who were hadyn and mozart
Answer:
Explanation:
Haydn and Mozart were two prominent composers of the classical era in music.
Franz Joseph Haydn (1732-1809) was an Austrian composer known for his significant contributions to the development of the symphony and the string quartet. He composed over 100 symphonies, numerous chamber music works, operas, choral music, and piano sonatas. Haydn's musical style was characterized by elegance, humor, and innovative use of musical forms.
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791) was also an Austrian composer, considered one of the greatest composers in Western music history. Mozart displayed prodigious talent from a young age and composed in various genres, including symphonies, concertos, chamber music, operas, and choral music. His works are known for their exceptional beauty, technical mastery, and emotional depth. Mozart's compositions are highly regarded for their complexity, melodic richness, and profound musical expression.
Both Haydn and Mozart had a significant influence on classical music and their compositions played a pivotal role in shaping the musical style of their time. They were key figures of the Viennese classical school and their works continue to be celebrated and performed widely to this day.
3. Compare the causes and outcomes of the American Revolution and the French Revolution. Identify two ways that that these revolutions were similar and two ways that they were different. Be sure to cite evidence from the course to support your response. (5 points)
The causes and outcomes of the American Revolution and the French Revolution:
Similar: Both revolutions were driven by the desire for independence and were influenced by Enlightenment ideas on liberty and equality.
Different: The American Revolution was a colonial uprising against British rule, while the French Revolution was a domestic revolution against monarchy and social inequality. The outcomes also differed, with the American Revolution resulting in the formation of the United States, while the French Revolution led to political turmoil and the rise of Napoleon.
The American Revolution and the French Revolution were both significant events in history that brought about major changes in their respective countries. While there are similarities between the two revolutions, there are also key differences.One similarity between the two revolutions is the shared goal of achieving independence and overthrowing oppressive regimes. In the American Revolution, colonists fought for their independence from British rule, seeking to establish a democratic system. Similarly, the French Revolution aimed to overthrow the monarchy and establish a more egalitarian society, where power resided with the people.Another similarity is the influence of Enlightenment ideas on both revolutions. The American Revolution was heavily influenced by Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke, who advocated for natural rights and limited government. Similarly, the French Revolution was driven by Enlightenment principles of liberty, equality, and fraternity, as expressed in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen.However, there are also notable differences between the two revolutions. Firstly, the American Revolution was primarily a colonial uprising against a distant imperial power, while the French Revolution was a domestic revolution against an entrenched monarchy and social hierarchy.Additionally, the outcomes of the revolutions differed significantly. The American Revolution resulted in the formation of a new nation, the United States of America, with a constitution and a representative government. In contrast, the French Revolution led to a period of political instability, the rise of radical factions, and eventually the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte as a dictator.In conclusion, while the American and French Revolutions shared common goals of independence and were influenced by Enlightenment ideals, they differed in terms of their contexts, outcomes, and long-term effects on their respective countries.For more such questions on American Revolution:
https://brainly.com/question/1799447
#SPJ8
Features of the International Gothic style? choices
none of these
naturalism
elegant
elongated figures
it is influenced by Northern France
decorative coloring
all of these
Answer:
it is influenced by northern france
All of the above choices accurately describe the features of the International Gothic style.
The International Gothic style emerged in the late 14th century and prevailed throughout the 15th century in Europe. It was characterized by a combination of different artistic elements and influences from various regions, including Northern France.
One of the prominent features of this style was its naturalism, which aimed to depict figures and scenes in a more realistic and lifelike manner. The artists of the International Gothic style often emphasized elegance and refinement in their compositions, using elongated figures to create a sense of grace and sophistication. Additionally, decorative coloring played a significant role, with vibrant and intricate patterns adorning the artworks. The International Gothic style incorporated elements of ornamentation, delicate details, and intricate craftsmanship, reflecting a heightened sense of luxury and splendor.Overall, the International Gothic style encompassed all of these characteristics, showcasing the diverse influences and aesthetic qualities of the period. Hence the correct option is ''all of the above''.
For more questions on Gothic style
https://brainly.com/question/32275533
#SPJ8
Timeline of the three Stages of the triangular trade
with dates!!
The triangular trade refers to a historical trade route that connected Europe, Africa, and the Americas during the colonial era. It involved the exchange of goods, including enslaved Africans, raw materials, and manufactured goods. The triangular trade can be divided into three main stages, each with its distinct timeline:
1. Stage 1: The Outward Passage (15th to 18th centuries)
- 15th century: European exploration and the beginning of the Atlantic slave trade.
- 16th century: The establishment of European colonies in the Americas and the growth of sugar plantations.
- Late 16th to early 17th century: The emergence of the triangular trade pattern with Europe sending manufactured goods to Africa, Africa supplying enslaved Africans to the Americas, and the Americas exporting raw materials back to Europe.
. Stage 2: The Middle Passage (16th to 19th centuries)
- 16th to 18th centuries: The height of the Atlantic slave trade, with millions of Africans forcibly transported to the Americas.
- 18th century: Increased demand for African slaves in the Caribbean and North America due to the expansion of plantation economies.
- Late 18th century: Growing abolitionist movements and the gradual decline of the slave trade.
3. Stage 3: The Return Passage (17th to 19th centuries)
- 17th to 19th centuries: European ships carrying raw materials, such as sugar, tobacco, and cotton, back to Europe from the Americas.
- 19th century: The Industrial Revolution in Europe leads to increased demand for raw materials from the colonies.
for more questions on trade
https://brainly.com/question/14926566
#SPJ8
What does IAU stands for?
Answer:
intermolecular assess undri
Answer:
International Astronomical Union
Explanation:
what was one posotive outcome of the Northern America free trade agreement for the united states
Answer:
The expansion of trade and market access. NAFTA, which created a free trade zone between the United States, Canada, and Mexico.
This agreement eliminated many barriers to trade, such as tariffs and quotas, allowing businesses in the United States to export goods and services to Canada and Mexico. It also opened up new markets for American companies, allowing them to increase their exports and reach a larger customer base.
As a result of NAFTA, the United States trade with Canada and Mexico flourished. The agreement strengthened economic ties between the three countries and facilitated the integration of supply chains across North America. The automotive, agriculture, and manufacturing, industries benefited from increased trade and investment under NAFTA.
Furthermore, NAFTA also fostered foreign direct investment (FDI) in the United States. The agreement provided a predictable and stable business environment, attracting investment from Canadian and Mexican companies. This influx of FDI contributed to job creation, economic growth, and technological advancements in various sectors of the U.S. economy.
Explanation:
Who was Alexander Hamilton, and why was he significant?
Answer: Alexander Hamilton was a prominent figure in American history, known as one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. Born in the West Indies, he immigrated to America and played a vital role in shaping the young nation. Hamilton's significance lies in his contributions to the formation of the U.S. Constitution as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention of 1787. He co-authored the Federalist Papers, a collection of essays advocating for the ratification of the Constitution. As the first Secretary of the Treasury under President George Washington, Hamilton implemented economic policies that established a solid financial foundation for the country. His vision for a strong central government, national bank, and economic development had a lasting impact on American politics and economics, shaping the trajectory of the nation.
Explanation:
Imagine someone is asking this question to you
Would you be in favor of immigration caps on people entering the state of Tx? Why or why not?
(This is government)
Those in favor of immigration caps may argue that such measures can help regulate population growth, preserve resources, and maintain social and economic stability.
What are other reasons to favor the immigration?They may also highlight the importance of ensuring that existing infrastructure and public services can adequately support the needs of both current residents and newcomers.
On the other hand, opponents of immigration caps may argue that they can hinder economic growth and innovation, as immigrants often contribute to the workforce and bring diverse skills and perspectives.
They may also emphasize the humanitarian aspect, advocating for more inclusive and compassionate immigration policies.
Ultimately, the stance on immigration caps depends on various factors, including social, economic, and political considerations, and it is subject to ongoing debates and discussions.
Read more about immigration here:
https://brainly.com/question/17141328
#SPJ1
3. Write a brief paragraph describing the New Imperialism. Be sure to describe what it was, when it occurred, and what motivated it.
What was the result ahmed gragns war
Ahmed Gragn's war was a conflict that occurred in the 16th century between Adal Sultanate and Abyssinia. The result of the war was that Adal Sultanate was defeated by Abyssinia and Ahmed Gragn was killed.
Ahmed Gragn, also known as Ahmed Gran, was an influential Muslim leader who led the Adal Sultanate against Abyssinia in the 16th century. His invasion of Abyssinia resulted in a significant conflict that lasted for around 14 years, beginning in 1529 AD.
The conflict began when Ahmed Gragn launched an attack on the Christian kingdom of Abyssinia, which was ruled by Lebna Dengel at the time. In 1531, he was able to capture the city of Harar, which gave him a strategic position to launch further attacks on Abyssinia. However, despite his early successes, Ahmed Gragn's campaign ultimately failed, and he was killed in 1543.
The war between Adal Sultanate and Abyssinia was a significant event in the history of Ethiopia. The conflict weakened Adal Sultanate and strengthened Abyssinia. After Ahmed Gragn's death, Abyssinia continued to expand its territory, and its rulers maintained control of the region for several centuries.
learn more about Ahmed Gragn's war
https://brainly.com/question/15233756
It faced what the government called a severe nationalities problem.
Italy
Britain
Russia
Germany
France
Austria-Hungary
The government of Austria-Hungary faced what it considered a severe nationalities problem during its existence. So, the correct option is Austria-Hungary.
Austria-Hungary was a multinational empire composed of various ethnic groups, including Germans, Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, Romanians, Croats, and others.
The empire was characterized by a diverse population with different languages, cultures, and national aspirations. This diversity posed a significant challenge for the government in maintaining stability and unity within the empire.The nationalities problem in Austria-Hungary referred to the tensions and conflicts arising from the nationalist aspirations of different ethnic groups. These groups sought greater autonomy, cultural recognition, and political rights, often advocating for independence or self-determination.The government's attempts to address these demands and maintain control over its diverse territories were met with varying degrees of success and often exacerbated tensions.Ultimately, the nationalities problem played a significant role in the eventual dissolution of Austria-Hungary after World War I, as nationalist movements and the desire for self-rule led to the emergence of independent nations in the empire's former territories. Hence, the correct option is Austria-Hungary.
For more questions on government
https://brainly.com/question/31590479
#SPJ8
Which statements about West African kingdoms of the 1300s and 1400s are true?
Choose all answers that are correct.
Responses
The kingdom of Benin was known for its skilled brass makers and well-organized capital.
The rainforest of Africa supports grasses and other plants and birds, but its soil is too wet for the roots of tall trees.
Benin was located in the Savanna and relied on the large animals found there for food.
Sunni Ali, ruler of Songhai, conquered Mali and destroyed the city of Timbuktu.
The correct statement among the options provided is option a. The kingdom of Benin was known for its skilled brass makers and well-organized capital.
Option b is incorrect because the rainforest of Africa typically has tall trees and diverse vegetation due to its humid climate.
Option c is incorrect because Benin was not located in the Savanna. It was situated in a forested region in what is now modern-day Nigeria.
Option d is incorrect. Sunni Ali, the ruler of the Songhai Empire, did not conquer Mali or destroy the city of Timbuktu. Instead, he expanded the territories of the Songhai Empire, primarily in the western Sudan region, and consolidated his power.
Sunni Ali ruled the Songhai Empire from 1464 to 1492. He was a skilled military leader and administrator who strengthened the empire's military forces and centralized its administration. Under his rule, the Songhai Empire expanded its territory through military campaigns, primarily against neighboring states such as Mali.
Although Timbuktu was an important city within the region, Sunni Ali did not destroy it. In fact, Timbuktu thrived as a major center of trade, Islamic scholarship, and cultural exchange during the height of the Songhai Empire. It became renowned for its mosques, libraries, and as a hub for trans-Saharan trade.
It's important to note that the history of West African kingdoms in the 1300s and 1400s is complex and varied, with multiple states rising and falling during this period. While the statement about Benin is accurate, the other options contain inaccuracies or do not pertain to the specific kingdoms of the 1300s and 1400s. Therefore the correct option is A
Know more about trans-Saharan trade here:
https://brainly.com/question/28320109
#SPJ8
Which statements correctly describe the Arizona Supreme Court? Check all that apply.
The justices are elected by the voting public.
The justices are appointed by the governor.
The Arizona Supreme Court is made up of five justices.
The Arizona Supreme Court interprets Arizona’s laws.
The justices serve for life or until they retire.
The Arizona Supreme Court is the highest law in the state.
The justices serve for a limited term of six years.
Answer:
Explanation:
m m
Lincoln 10 percent plan
Which was the last island that the Allie’s captured before preparing to attack mainland Japan
Answer: Iwo Jima
Explanation: It was the final island the partners captured before the assult on terrain Japan. They considered it to be crucial to capture and guarantee lines of supply and communication.
Answer:
Iwo Jima
Explanation:
What were the Articles of Confederation? What were its weaknesses?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation were the first written constitution of the United States, in effect from 1781 to 1789. They served as the framework for the government during and immediately after the American Revolution. The main goal of the Articles of Confederation was to establish a loose confederation of sovereign states with a weak central government.
The weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation were as follows:
1. Weak central government: The Articles created a weak central government with limited powers. The central government lacked the authority to enforce laws, regulate trade, or levy taxes, leading to difficulties in governing effectively.
2. Lack of executive and judicial branches: The Articles did not establish an executive branch to enforce laws or a national judiciary to interpret them. This created a power vacuum and hindered the resolution of disputes between states.
3. No power to tax: The central government had no authority to levy taxes, relying on voluntary contributions from states. This resulted in financial instability and difficulty in funding national programs and defense.
4. Inability to regulate commerce: The central government had no power to regulate interstate or foreign commerce. This led to trade disputes between states and hindered economic growth.
5. Unanimous consent required for amendments: The Articles required unanimous consent from all 13 states to amend the document, making it difficult to implement necessary changes and reforms.
6. Lack of unity and coordination: The confederation of states under the Articles faced challenges in achieving unity and cooperation. Each state had its own interests and priorities, leading to conflicts and difficulties in making collective decisions.
7. Inadequate defense system: The central government had limited power to raise an army or maintain a national defense. This left the nation vulnerable to external threats and made it difficult to protect its interests.
These weaknesses ultimately led to the call for a stronger central government, which resulted in the drafting and adoption of the United States Constitution in 1787, replacing the Articles of Confederation and establishing a more robust federal system.
The meeting where Republicans and Democrats choose the leaders of their parties in each house of Congress is called the _____.
committee
convention
whip
caucus
Answer: D. caucus
Explanation: The meeting where Republicans and Democrats choose their leaders of their parties in each house of Congress is called the caucus.
(sorry if i'm wrong)
In your opinion, do you think the Bill of Rights is meant to apply in all situations, including times of war? Should it be legal to take away the rights of a small portion of the American public on a temporary basis if most Americans believe it will lead to greater security? Explain your opinion.
In my personal opinion, the Bill of Rights has every right to take away portions of America. When it comes to times of War expressly. This is because sacrifices have to be made for a brighter tomorrow. If that means temporarily taking away some rights of small portions of American public, so be it. "We the People" fight for the Greater Good.