The actual frequency of the ambulance's siren is approximately 481.87 Hz.
To determine the actual frequency of the ambulance's siren, we need to consider the Doppler effect. The Doppler effect describes the change in frequency of a wave when the source of the wave and the observer are in relative motion.
In this case, you are driving towards the ambulance, so you are the observer. The ambulance's siren is the source of the sound waves. When the source and the observer are moving toward each other, the observed frequency is higher than the actual frequency.
We can use the Doppler effect formula for sound to calculate the actual frequency:
f' = (v + vo) / (v + vs) * f
Where:
f' is the observed frequency
f is the actual frequency
v is the speed of sound
vo is the velocity of the observer
vs is the velocity of the source
Given that you are driving at a velocity of 37 m/s towards the ambulance, the ambulance is traveling at a velocity of 44 m/s towards you, and the observed frequency is 426 Hz, we can substitute these values into the formula:
426 = (v + 37) / (v - 44) * f
To solve for f, we need the speed of sound (v). Assuming the speed of sound is approximately 343 m/s, which is the speed of sound in dry air at room temperature, we can solve the equation for f:
426 = (343 + 37) / (343 - 44) * f
Simplifying the equation, we get:
426 = 380 / 299 * f
f ≈ 481.87 Hz
To learn more about frequency
https://brainly.com/question/254161
#SPJ11
A picture window has dimensions of 1.40 mx2.50 m and is made of glass 5.10 mm thick. On a winter day, the outside temperature is -20.0 °C, while the inside temperature is a comfortable 20.5 °C. At what rate is heat being lost through the window by conduction? Express your answer using three significant figures.
At what rate would heat be lost through the window if you covered it with a 0.750 mm-thick layer of paper (thermal conductivity 0.0500 W/m .K)? Express your answer using three significant figures.
A picture window has dimensions of 1.40 mx2.50 m and is made of glass 5.10 mm thick the rate of heat loss through the window if covered with a 0.750 mm-thick layer of paper
To calculate the rate at which heat is being lost through the window by conduction, we can use the formula:
Q = k * A * (ΔT / d)
where:
Q is the rate of heat loss (in watts),
k is the thermal conductivity of the material (in watts per meter-kelvin),
A is the surface area of the window (in square meters),
ΔT is the temperature difference between the inside and outside (in kelvin), and
d is the thickness of the window (in meters).
Given data:
Window dimensions: 1.40 m x 2.50 m
Glass thickness: 5.10 mm (or 0.00510 m)
Outside temperature: -20.0 °C (or 253.15 K)
Inside temperature: 20.5 °C (or 293.65 K)
Thermal conductivity of glass: Assume a value of 0.96 W/m·K (typical for glass)
First, calculate the surface area of the window:
A = length x width
A = 1.40 m x 2.50 m
A = 3.50 m²
Next, calculate the temperature difference:
ΔT = inside temperature - outside temperature
ΔT = 293.65 K - 253.15 K
ΔT = 40.50 K
Now we can calculate the rate of heat loss through the window without the paper covering:
Q = k * A * (ΔT / d)
Q = 0.96 W/m·K * 3.50 m² * (40.50 K / 0.00510 m)
Q ≈ 10,352.94 W ≈ 10,350 W
The rate of heat loss through the window by conduction is approximately 10,350 watts.
To calculate the rate of heat loss through the window if covered with a 0.750 mm-thick layer of paper, we can use the same formula but substitute the thermal conductivity of paper (0.0500 W/m·K) for k and the thickness of the paper (0.000750 m)
To know more about dimensions refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31460047#
#SPJ11
Constructive interference can cause sound waves to produce a louder sound. What must be true for two moving waves to experience experience constructive interference?
A. The wave crests must match.
B. The wave throughs must cancel each other out.
C. The amplitudes must be equal.
Constructive interference can cause sound waves to produce a louder sound. For two moving waves to experience constructive interference their:
C. Amplitudes must be equal.
Constructive interference occurs when two or more waves superimpose in such a way that their amplitudes add up to produce a larger amplitude. In the case of sound waves, this can result in a louder sound.
For constructive interference to happen, several conditions must be met:
1. Same frequency: The waves involved in the interference must have the same frequency. This means that the peaks and troughs of the waves align in time.
2. Constant phase difference: The waves must have a constant phase difference, which means that corresponding points on the waves (such as peaks or troughs) are always offset by the same amount. This constant phase difference ensures that the waves consistently reinforce each other.
3. Equal amplitudes: The amplitudes of the waves must be equal for constructive interference to occur. When the amplitudes are equal, the peaks and troughs align perfectly, resulting in maximum constructive interference.
If the amplitudes of the waves are unequal, the superposition of the waves will lead to a combination of constructive and destructive interference, resulting in a different amplitude and potentially a different sound intensity.
Therefore, for two waves to experience constructive interference and produce a louder sound, their amplitudes must be equal. This allows the waves to reinforce each other, resulting in an increased amplitude and perceived loudness.
To know more about Constructive interference here
https://brainly.com/question/31857527
#SPJ4
What is the frequency of the emitted gamma photons (140-keV)?
(Note: Use Planck's constant h=6.6 x 10^-34 Js and the elemental
charge e=1.6 x 10^-19 C)
Can someone explain the process on how they got Solution: The correct answer is B. = A. The photon energy is 140 keV = 140 x 10^3 x 1.6 x 10-19 ) = 2.24 x 10-14 ]. This numerical value is inconsistent with the photon frequency derived as the ratio
The frequency of the emitted gamma photons with an energy of 140 keV is incorrect.
Step 1:
The frequency of the emitted gamma photons with an energy of 140 keV is incorrectly calculated.
Step 2:
To calculate the frequency of the emitted gamma photons, we can use the equation E = hf, where E is the energy of the photon, h is Planck's constant, and f is the frequency of the photon. In this case, we are given the energy of the photon (140 keV) and need to find the frequency.
First, we need to convert the energy from keV to joules. Since 1 keV is equal to 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁶ J, the energy of the photon can be calculated as follows:
140 keV = 140 × 10³ × 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁶ J = 2.24 × 10⁻¹⁴ J
Now we can rearrange the equation E = hf to solve for the frequency f:
f = E / h = (2.24 × 10⁻¹⁴ J) / (6.6 × 10⁻³⁴ Js) ≈ 3.39 × 10¹⁹ Hz
Therefore, the correct frequency of the emitted gamma photons with an energy of 140 keV is approximately 3.39 × 10¹⁹ Hz.
Planck's constant, denoted by h, is a fundamental constant in quantum mechanics that relates the energy of a photon to its frequency. It quantifies the discrete nature of energy and is essential in understanding the behavior of particles at the microscopic level.
By applying the equation E = hf, where E is energy and f is frequency, we can determine the frequency of a photon given its energy. In this case, we used the energy of the gamma photons (140 keV) and Planck's constant to calculate the correct frequency. It is crucial to be accurate in the conversion of units to obtain the correct result.
Learn more about frequency
brainly.com/question/29739263
#SPJ11
"Why might a low metalicity environment lead to larger black
holes forming?
In a low metallicity environment, where the abundance of heavy elements like carbon, oxygen, and iron is relatively low, the formation of larger black holes can be influenced by several factors.
First, low metallicity implies that there is less material available to cool and fragment, leading to the formation of massive stars. Massive stars are more likely to undergo core-collapse supernovae, leaving behind massive stellar remnants that can potentially evolve into black holes.Secondly, metal-rich environments can enhance the efficiency of mass loss through stellar winds, reducing the mass available for black hole formation. In contrast, low metallicity environments have weaker winds, allowing more mass to be retained by the stars, contributing to the formation of larger black holes.Furthermore, low metallicity environments also have lower opacity, which facilitates the accretion of mass onto the forming black holes. This increased accretion can lead to the growth of black holes to larger sizes over time. Overall, the combination of these factors in a low metallicity environment can favor the formation and growth of larger black holes.Learn more about the black holes:
brainly.com/question/6037502
#SPJ11
What is the current through a 3.000 resistor that has a 4.00V potential drop across it? 1.33A 1.00A 12.0A 0.750A
The current through a 3.000 resistor that has a 4.00V potential drop across it is 1.33A.
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that the voltage is given by Ohm’s law asV = IRWhereV = VoltageI = CurrentR = Resistance.
The current through the resistor is given by I = V/R.
We are given the voltage across the resistor as 4.00V and the resistance of the resistor as 3.000 ohms.
Substituting the given values in the above formula, we get;I = V/RI
= 4.00V/3.000 ohmsI
= 1.33A
Thus the current through the resistor is 1.33A.
Learn more about voltage from this link:
https://brainly.com/question/1176850
#SPJ11
Score 2 SA biker and her bike have a combined mass of 80.0 kg and are traveling at a speed of 3.00 m/s. If the same biker and bike travel twice as fast, their kinetic energy will_by a factor of Increa
The kinetic energy of the SA biker and her bike is increased by a factor of four (1440/360 = 4) when their velocity is doubled is the answer.
The kinetic energy of the SA biker and her bike will be increased by a factor of four if they travel twice as fast as they were. Here's how to explain it: Kinetic energy (KE) is proportional to the square of velocity (v).
This implies that if the velocity of an object increases, the KE will increase as well.
The formula for kinetic energy is: KE = 0.5mv²where KE = kinetic energy, m = mass, and v = velocity.
The SA biker and her bike have a combined mass of 80.0 kg and are travelling at a speed of 3.00 m/s, which implies that their kinetic energy can be determined as follows: KE = 0.5 x 80.0 x (3.00)²KE = 360 J
If the same biker and bike travel twice as fast, their velocity would be 6.00 m/s.
The kinetic energy of the system can be calculated using the same formula: KE = 0.5 x 80.0 x (6.00)²KE = 1440 J
The kinetic energy of the SA biker and her bike is increased by a factor of four (1440/360 = 4) when their velocity is doubled.
know more about kinetic energy
https://brainly.com/question/999862
#SPJ11
what is gravitational force 2-kg the wanitude of the between two 2m apart? bodies that are
The magnitude of the gravitational force between two 2 kg bodies that are 2 m apart is approximately 1.33 x 10^-11 N (newtons).
The gravitational force between two objects can be calculated using Newton's law of universal gravitation. The formula for the gravitational force (F) between two objects is given by:
F = (G * m1 * m2) / r^2
where G is the gravitational constant (approximately 6.67430 x 10^-11 N m^2/kg^2), m1 and m2 are the masses of the two objects, and r is the distance between the centers of the two objects.
Substituting the given values into the formula, where m1 = m2 = 2 kg and r = 2 m, we can calculate the magnitude of the gravitational force:
F = (6.67430 x 10^-11 N m^2/kg^2 * 2 kg * 2 kg) / (2 m)^2
≈ 1.33 x 10^-11 N
Therefore, the magnitude of the gravitational-force between two 2 kg bodies that are 2 m apart is approximately 1.33 x 10^-11 N.
To learn more about gravitational-force , click here : https://brainly.com/question/16613634
#SPJ11
This chart shows four atoms, labeled W, X, Y, and Z. These atoms can combine with each other to form molecules.
Which combination of atoms will form a molecule, but not a compound?
W and X
X and Y
W and Z
Y and Z
Answer:
Where is the picture?
All molecules that contain carbon (C) and at least hydrogen (H) atoms is one example until I see what that missing diagram says.
M 87 an elliptical galaxy has the angular measurement of 8.9' by 5.8', what is the classification of this galaxy.
Based on the given angular measurements of 8.9' by 5.8', M87 can be classified as an elongated elliptical galaxy due to its oval shape and lack of prominent spiral arms or disk structures.
Elliptical galaxies are characterized by their elliptical or oval shape, with little to no presence of spiral arms or disk structures. The classification of galaxies is often based on their morphological features, and elliptical galaxies typically have a smooth and featureless appearance.
The ellipticity, or elongation, of the galaxy is determined by the ratio of the major axis (8.9') to the minor axis (5.8'). In the case of M87, with a larger major axis, it is likely to be classified as an elongated or "elongated elliptical" galaxy.
To know more about elliptical galaxy refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30799703
#SPJ11
Solar radiation strikes Earth's atmosphere each day. These collisions knock electrons off of atoms and create very many lons. Pain carries the electrons to the ground so that, to a good approximation, Earth's surface can be thought of as a uniform ahell of negative charge −Q and the atmosphere can be thought of as a concentric shell of positive charge +Q. - What is the magnitude of the resulting electric field (due to this arrangement of charges) that an astronaut on the Moon would measure? (Assume the Moon is outside of Earth's atmosphere.) - What is the magnitude of the resulting electric field that a geologist would measure after tunneling to some point deep inside the Earth?
The exact magnitude of the electric field measured by the geologist would depend on their depth inside the Earth and the specific charge distribution within Earth's surface and atmosphere.
To determine the magnitude of the resulting electric field due to the arrangement of charges between Earth's surface and atmosphere, we can use Gauss's law for electric fields.
Electric field measured by an astronaut on the Moon:
Assuming the Moon is outside Earth's atmosphere, the net charge enclosed within the surface of the Moon is zero since it is not affected by the charges on Earth. Therefore, an astronaut on the Moon would measure zero electric field due to the arrangement of charges between Earth's surface and atmosphere.
Magnitude of electric field measured by an astronaut on the Moon: 0
Electric field measured by a geologist deep inside the Earth:
When a geologist tunnels to a point deep inside the Earth, we can still consider Earth's surface and atmosphere as the source of the charges. However, as the geologist tunnels deeper, the electric field due to the charges on the surface and atmosphere will decrease because the distance between the geologist and the charges increases.
The magnitude of the resulting electric field due to the arrangement of charges decreases with distance from the charges. Therefore, a geologist deep inside the Earth would measure a significantly reduced electric field compared to the surface of the Earth or the atmosphere.
The exact magnitude of the electric field measured by the geologist would depend on their depth inside the Earth and the specific charge distribution within Earth's surface and atmosphere. Without further information, it is difficult to provide an exact value for the electric field at a specific depth inside the Earth.
Learn more about electric field from the given link!
https://brainly.com/question/19878202
#SPJ11
Two uncharged conducting spheres are separated by a distance d. When charge - Qis moved from sphere A to sphere, the Coulomb force between them has magnitude For HINT (a) is the Coulomb force attractive or repulsive? attractive repulsive (b) an additional charge ou moved from A to , what is the ratio of the new Coulomb force to the original Cowomb force, Chane (If shere is neutralized so it has no net charge, what is the ratio of the new to the original Coulomb forbe, Need Holo
(a) The Coulomb force between two uncharged conducting spheres is always attractive.
(b) When an additional charge is moved from one sphere to another, the ratio of the new Coulomb force to the original Coulomb force depends on the magnitude of the additional charge and the initial separation between the spheres. If the spheres are neutralized, the new-to-original Coulomb force ratio becomes 0.
(a) The Coulomb force between two uncharged conducting spheres is always attractive. This is because when a charge -Q is moved from one sphere to the other, the negatively charged sphere attracts the positive charge induced on the other sphere due to the redistribution of charges. As a result, the spheres experience an attractive Coulomb force.
(b) When an additional charge q is moved from one sphere to another, the new Coulomb force between the spheres can be calculated using the formula:
F' = k * (Q + q)² / d²,
where F' is the new Coulomb force, k is the Coulomb's constant, Q is the initial charge on the sphere, q is the additional charge moved, and d is the separation between the spheres.
The ratio of the new Coulomb force (F') to the original Coulomb force (F) is given by:
F' / F = (Q + q)² / Q².
If the spheres are neutralized, meaning Q = 0, then the ratio becomes:
F' / F = q² / 0² = 0.
In this case, when the spheres are neutralized, the new-to-original Coulomb force ratio becomes 0.
Learn more about Coulomb force here:
https://brainly.com/question/11141051
#SPJ11
A slab of plastic rests on a slab of glass. A ray of light in the plastic crosses the interface between the plastic and the glass with the result that the ray bends toward the normal. What must be true about the indices of refraction in these materials? Write your answer in terms of inequalities of
the index's of refraction.
For the ray of light in the plastic to bend toward the normal as it crosses into the glass, the index of refraction of the plastic (n1) must be greater than the index of refraction of the glass (n2), expressed as n1 > n2.
The bending of a ray of light toward the normal as it crosses the interface between two media indicates that the ray is transitioning from a medium with a higher index of refraction to a medium with a lower index of refraction.
In this case, let's denote the index of refraction of the plastic as n1 and the index of refraction of the glass as n2. The bending of the light toward the normal occurs when n1 > n2.
This can be explained by Snell's law, which states that the angle of refraction of a ray of light passing from one medium to another is determined by the indices of refraction of the two media. According to Snell's law, when light travels from a medium with a higher index of refraction to a medium with a lower index of refraction, it bends toward the normal.
To know more about refraction refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/13088981#
#SPJ11
Waves from two slits are in phase at the slits and travel to a distant screen to produce the second side maximum of the two-slit interference pattern. The difference in the distance traveled by the waves is _____
The difference in the distance traveled by the waves is half of the wavelength (λ/2). The two waves traveling from the slits will destructively interfere if the path difference between them is exactly one-half of the wavelength.
Waves from two slits are in phase at the slits and travel to a distant screen to produce the second side maximum of the two-slit interference pattern. The difference in the distance traveled by the waves is half of the wavelength.
Let us understand the concept of Young's double-slit experiment. In this experiment, two coherent light waves are made to interfere with each other in such a way that it becomes a visible interference pattern on a screen. The interference pattern results from the superposition of waves emitted by two coherent sources that are out of phase.
When light waves from two slits meet, the path difference between them can be calculated using the distance between the slits and the distance to the screen. The waves are in phase at the slits and travel to a distant screen to produce the second side maximum of the two-slit interference pattern. For the second side maximum, the path difference between the two waves from each of the slits is half of the wavelength.
Therefore, the difference in the distance traveled by the waves is half of the wavelength (λ/2). The two waves traveling from the slits will destructively interfere if the path difference between them is exactly one-half of the wavelength.
Learn more About waves from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/1173066
#SPJ11
A dentist's mirror is placed 2.7 cm from a tooth. The enlarged image is located 6.4 cm behind the mirror. (a) What kind of mirror (plane, concave, or convex) is being used? (b) Determine the focal length of the mirror. (c) What is the magnification? (d) How is the image oriented relative to the object?
(a) A convex mirror is being used. (b) Focal length can be calculated using the mirror formula:1/f = 1/v + 1/ushered, f is the focal length, u is the object distance, and v is the image distance.
Substituting the given values:1/f = 1/6.4 + 1/(-2.7) Solving this expression gives' = -5.5 thus, the focal length of the mirror is -5.5 cm.
The magnification, m, can be calculated using the relation = -v/substituting the given values:-v/u = 6.4/2.7 = 2.37Thus, the magnification of the image is 2.37.
To know more about mirror visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1160148
#SPJ11
The magnetic component of a polarized wave of light is given by Bx = (4.25 PT) sin[ky + (2.22 x 1015 5-2)t]. (a) In which direction does the wave travel, (b) parallel to which axis is it polarized, and (c) what is its intensity? (d) Write an expression for the electric field of the wave, including a value for the angular wave number. (e) What is the wavelength? (f) In which region of the electromagnetic spectrum is this electromagnetic wave? Assume that 299800000.000 m/s is speed of light. (a) a b) (b) (c) Number i Units (d) Ez =( i *103 ) sind i *106 ly+ + x 1015 )t] (e) Number Units (f)
(a) The wave travels in the positive y-direction.
(b) The wave is polarized parallel to the x-axis.
(c) The intensity cannot be determined without additional information.
(d) The expression for the electric field is Ex = (4.25 PT) * (299,800,000 m/s) * sin[ky + (2.22 x 10^15 m^(-2))t].
(e) The wavelength is approximately λ = 1/(13.96 x 10^15 m^(-1)).
(f) The specific region of the electromagnetic spectrum cannot be determined without the frequency information.
(a) To determine the direction in which the wave travels, we look at the argument inside the sine function, ky + (2.22 x 10^15 m^(-2))t. Since ky represents the wavevector component in the y-direction, we can conclude that the wave travels in the positive y-direction.
(b) The wave is polarized parallel to the x-axis. This is evident from the fact that the magnetic field component, Bx, is the only non-zero component given in the question.
(c) The intensity of an electromagnetic wave is given by the formula I = (1/2)ε₀cE², where ε₀ is the permittivity of vacuum, c is the speed of light, and E is the electric field amplitude. In the given expression for the magnetic field, we don't have the information to directly calculate the electric field amplitude. Hence, we can't determine the intensity without further information.
(d) The electric field (Ex) can be related to the magnetic field (Bx) using the equation B = E/c, where B is the magnetic field, E is the electric field, and c is the speed of light. Rearranging the equation, we have E = Bc. Substituting the given value for Bx and the speed of light (c = 299,800,000 m/s), we have:
Ex = (4.25 PT) * (299,800,000 m/s) * sin[ky + (2.22 x 10^15 m^(-2))t]
(e) The wavelength (λ) of the wave can be determined using the formula λ = 2π/k, where k is the wave number. From the given expression for the magnetic field, we can see that the angular wave number is given as (2.22 x 10^15 m^(-2)). Therefore, the wave number is k = 2π(2.22 x 10^15 m^(-2)) = 13.96 x 10^15 m^(-1). The wavelength is the reciprocal of the wave number, so λ = 1/k = 1/(13.96 x 10^15 m^(-1)).
(f) To determine the region of the electromagnetic spectrum in which this wave lies, we need to know the wavelength. However, we calculated the wave number in part (e), not the wavelength directly. To find the wavelength, we can use the equation λ = c/f, where c is the speed of light and f is the frequency. Unfortunately, the frequency is not provided in the given information, so we cannot determine the exact region of the electromagnetic spectrum without further information.
To learn more about wave click here brainly.com/question/27511773
#SPJ11
John and Anna both travel a distance of 8 kilometeres a) How long does it take John to cover the distance if he does half the distance at 6.3 kilometers per hour and
the other half at 1.2 kilometers per hour?
b) What is his average speed for the total distance? c) How long does it take Anna to cover the distance of 8.00 kilometers if she goes 6.3 kilometers per hour for
2/3 of the total time and 1.2 kilometers per hour for 1/3 of the time?
d) what is her average speed for the whole trip?
John and Anna both travel a distance of 8 kilometers (a)Total time ≈ 3.96 hours.(b)Average speed = ≈ 2.02 km/h(c)Total time ≈ 3.08 hours(c) average speed for the whole trip is 2.60 km/h
a) To find the time it takes for John to cover the distance, we need to calculate the time for each part of the distance and then add them together.
Time for the first half distance:
Distance = 8 km / 2 = 4 km
Speed = 6.3 km/h
Time = Distance / Speed = 4 km / 6.3 km/h ≈ 0.63 hours
Time for the second half distance:
Distance = 8 km / 2 = 4 km
Speed = 1.2 km/h
Time = Distance / Speed = 4 km / 1.2 km/h ≈ 3.33 hours
Total time = 0.63 hours + 3.33 hours ≈ 3.96 hours
b) To find John's average speed for the total distance, we divide the total distance by the total time.
Total distance = 8 km
Total time = 3.96 hours
Average speed = Total distance / Total time = 8 km / 3.96 hours ≈ 2.02 km/h
c) To find the time it takes for Anna to cover the distance, we need to calculate the time for each part of the distance and then add them together.
Time for the first part of the distance:
Distance = 8 km ×(2/3) ≈ 5.33 km
Speed = 6.3 km/h
Time = Distance / Speed = 5.33 km / 6.3 km/h ≈ 0.85 hours
Time for the second part of the distance:
Distance = 8 km ×(1/3) ≈ 2.67 km
Speed = 1.2 km/h
Time = Distance / Speed = 2.67 km / 1.2 km/h ≈ 2.23 hours
Total time = 0.85 hours + 2.23 hours ≈ 3.08 hours
d) To find Anna's average speed for the whole trip, we divide the total distance by the total time.
Total distance = 8 km
Total time = 3.08 hours
Average speed = Total distance / Total time = 8 km / 3.08 hours ≈ 2.60 km/h
To learn more about Speed visit: https://brainly.com/question/13943409
#SPJ11
A 600-nm-thick soap film (n = 1.40) in air is illuminated with white light in a direction perpendicular to the film. For how many different wavelengths in the 300 to 700 nm range is there (a) fully constructive interference and (b) fully destructive interference in the reflected light?
(a) There is one wavelength (1680 nm) in the 300 to 700 nm range that exhibits fully constructive interference , (b) There are no restrictions on the wavelength for fully destructive interference.
To determine the number of different wavelengths in the 300 to 700 nm range that exhibit fully constructive or fully destructive interference in the reflected light from a soap film, we can use the equation for the phase shift in thin films:
2nt cosθ = mλ
Where:
• n is the refractive index of the film material (1.40 for soap film)
• t is the thickness of the film (600 nm)
• θ is the angle of incidence (perpendicular in this case)
• m is the order of interference (0 for fully destructive, 1 for fully constructive)
• λ is the wavelength of light
(a) For fully constructive interference, m = 1. Plugging the given values into the equation, we have:
2(1.40)(600 nm)cos90° = 1λ 1680 nm = λ
Therefore, there is only one wavelength in the 300 to 700 nm range that exhibits fully constructive interference, and it is 1680 nm.
(b) For fully destructive interference, m = 0. Again, substituting the values into the equation:
2(1.40)(600 nm)cos90° = 0λ
This equation simplifies to 0 = 0, indicating that there is no restriction on the wavelength for fully destructive interference.
Learn more about wavelengths from the link
https://brainly.com/question/10750459
#SPJ11
A train car A is traveling at 10 m/s when it strikes an identical train car B
traveling in the same direction at 4 m/s. Determine the following: ( ) a. Assume a perfectly elastic collision. What speed is train car A
traveling after the collision?
b. What is the loss in total mechanical energy for the answer in part A
(AKE = KE - KEi c. Assume that the train cars couple or "join together" (perfectly inelastic collision). What speed is train car A traveling after the
collision?
d. What is the loss in total mechanical energy for the answer in part B
(AKE = KEr- KEi).
(a) After the perfectly elastic collision, train car A is still traveling at 10 m/s.
(b) There is no loss in total mechanical energy in a perfectly elastic collision.
(c) After the perfectly inelastic collision, the combined train cars are traveling at a speed of 7 m/s.
(d) The loss in total mechanical energy in a perfectly inelastic collision is 9 times the mass of the train cars.
(a) In a perfectly elastic collision, both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved. Let the mass of each train car be denoted by m. Using the principle of conservation of momentum:
Initial momentum = Final momentum
(mass of A * velocity of A before collision) + (mass of B * velocity of B before collision) = (mass of A * velocity of A after collision) + (mass of B * velocity of B after collision)
(m * 10) + (m * 4) = (m * vA) + (m * vB)
Simplifying the equation:
14m = m(vA + vB)
Since the masses of train car A and train car B are identical, the mass terms cancel out:
14 = vA + vB
Since train car B is initially at rest (velocity of B before collision = 0), the equation becomes:
14 = vA
Therefore, after the collision, train car A is traveling at a speed of 14 m/s.
(b) In a perfectly elastic collision, there is no loss in total mechanical energy. Therefore, the loss in total mechanical energy for part (a) is 0.
(c) In a perfectly inelastic collision, the two train cars stick together and move as a single unit.
Using the principle of conservation of momentum:
Initial momentum = Final momentum
(mass of A * velocity of A before the collision) + (mass of B * velocity of B before collision) = (mass of A + mass of B) * velocity after collision
(m * 10) + (m * 4) = (2m) * v
Simplifying the equation:
14m = 2mv
Simplifying further:
7 = v
Therefore, after the collision, the combined train cars are traveling at a speed of 7 m/s.
(d) In a perfectly inelastic collision, there is a loss in total mechanical energy. The loss in total mechanical energy for part (c) can be calculated as the difference between the initial kinetic energy (KEi) and the final kinetic energy (KEr).
Initial kinetic energy (KEi) = (1/2) * mass of A * (velocity of A before collision)^2 + (1/2) * mass of B * (velocity of B before collision)^2
Final kinetic energy (KEr) = (1/2) * (mass of A + mass of B) * (velocity after collision)^2
Substituting the values:
KEi = (1/2) * m * (10^2) + (1/2) * m * (4^2)
KEr = (1/2) * (2m) * (7^2)
Simplifying the equations:
KEi = 58m
KEr = 49m
Loss in total mechanical energy (AKE) = KEr - KEi = 49m - 58m = -9m
Therefore, the loss in total mechanical energy for part (c) is -9m.
Learn more about the elastic collision at https://brainly.com/question/12644900
#SPJ11
There are two identical, positively charged conducting spheres fixed in space. The spheres are 42.0 cm apart (center to center) and repel each other with an electrostatic force of 1=0.0630 N . A thin conducting wire connects the spheres, redistributing the charge on each sphere. When the wire is removed, the spheres still repel, but with a force of 2=0.100 N . The Coulomb force constant is =1/(40)=8.99×109 N⋅m2/C2 . Using this information, find the initial charge on each sphere, 1 and 2 , if 1 is initially less than 2 .
The initial charge on sphere 1 is 2.945 × 10⁻⁷ C, and the initial charge on sphere 2 is 3.180 × 10⁻⁷ C.
Let the initial charges on the two spheres be q₁ and q₂. The electrostatic force between two point charges with charges q₁ and q₂ separated by a distance r is given by Coulomb's law:
F = (k × q₁ × q₂) / r²
where k = 1/(4πϵ₀) = 8.99 × 10⁹ N·m²/C² is the Coulomb force constant.
ϵ₀ is the permittivity of free space. ϵ₀ = 1/(4πk) = 8.854 × 10⁻¹² C²/N·m².
The electrostatic force between the two spheres is:
F₁ = F₂ = 0.0630 N.
The distance between the centers of the spheres is r = 42.0 cm = 0.420 m.
Let the final charges on the two spheres be q'₁ and q'₂.
The electrostatic force between the two spheres after connecting them by a wire is:
F'₁ = F'₂ = 0.100 N.
Now, the charges on the spheres redistribute when the wire is connected. So, we need to use the principle of conservation of charge. The net charge on the two spheres is conserved. Let Q be the total charge on the two spheres.
Then, Q = q₁ + q₂ = q'₁ + q'₂ ... (1)
The wire has negligible resistance, so it does not change the potential of the spheres. The potential difference between the two spheres is the same before and after connecting the wire. Therefore, the charge on each sphere is proportional to its initial charge and inversely proportional to the distance between the centers of the spheres when connected by the wire. Let the charges on the spheres change by q₁ to q'₁ and by q₂ to q'₂.
Let d be the distance between the centers of the spheres when the wire is connected. Then,
d = r - 2a = 0.420 - 2 × 0.015 = 0.390 m
where a is the radius of each sphere.
The ratio of the final charge q'₁ on sphere 1 to its initial charge q₁ is proportional to the ratio of the distance d to the initial distance r. Thus,
q'₁/q₁ = d/r ... (2)
Similarly,
q'₂/q₂ = d/r ... (3)
From equations (1), (2), and (3), we have:
q'₁ + q'₂ = q₁ + q₂
and
q'₁/q₁ = q'₂/q₂ = d/r
Therefore, (q'₁ + q'₂)/q₁ = (q'₁ + q'₂)/q₂ = 1 + d/r = 1 + 0.390/0.420 = 1.929
Therefore, q₁ = Q/(1 + d/r) = Q/1.929
Similarly, q₂ = Q - q₁ = Q - Q/1.929 = Q/0.929
Substituting the values of q₁ and q₂ in the expression for the electrostatic force F₁ = (k × q₁ × q₂) / r², we get:
0.0630 = (8.99 × 10⁹ N·m²/C²) × (Q/(1 + d/r)) × (Q/0.929) / (0.420)²
Solving for Q, we get:
Q = 6.225 × 10⁻⁷ C
Substituting the value of Q in the expressions for q₁ and q₂, we get:
q₁ = 2.945 × 10⁻⁷ C
q₂ = 3.180 × 10⁻⁷ C
Learn more about electrostatic force at https://brainly.com/question/20797960
#SPJ11
A radio signal is broadcast uniformly in all directions. The intensity is I 0 at a distance d 0 from the transmitter. Determine the intensity at a distance 2d 0 from the transmitter. (1/4)I 0 2I 0 l 0 (1/2)0 4l 0
The intensity at a distance 2d0 from the transmitter is (1/4)I0.
The intensity of a wave is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source. Mathematically, we can express this relationship as:
I = k/d^2
where I is the intensity, k is a constant, and d is the distance from the source.
In this scenario, the intensity at a distance d0 is given as I0. We want to determine the intensity at a distance 2d0.
Using the relationship mentioned earlier, we can set up the following proportion:
I0 / (d0^2) = I / ((2d0)^2)
Simplifying the equation:
I0 / d0^2 = I / (4d0^2)
Cross-multiplying and solving for I:
4d0^2 * I0 = d0^2 * I
I = (1/4)I0
To learn more about intensity: https://brainly.com/question/31731554
#SPJ11
4. A rescue plane wants to drop supplies to isolated mountain climbers on a rocky ridge 347.67 m below. Assume the plane is travelling horizontally with a speed of 79.247 m/s. The speed (m/s) of the supplies as it reaches the mountain climbers is:
The speed of the supplies as it reaches the mountain climbers is 83.17 m/s. When a rescue plane wants to drop supplies to isolated mountain climbers on a rocky ridge 347.67 m below while assuming the plane is travelling horizontally with a speed of 79.247 m/s.
The speed (m/s) of the supplies as it reaches the mountain climbers can be calculated by applying the equations of motion.There are a few variables that we have to consider:Distance d = 347.67 mInitial velocity u = 0m/s Acceleration a = 9.81m/s²
We have to find the final velocity v when the supplies are dropped at a distance of 347.67 m below the plane, given that the initial velocity of the supplies is zero when it is dropped. Here, the plane is moving at a constant horizontal velocity, which means there is no acceleration in the horizontal direction.
Therefore, we can use the vertical component of motion to solve for the final velocity of the supplies when it hits the ground. We know that the supplies are dropped from rest, so the initial velocity is zero and the acceleration acting on the supplies is the acceleration due to gravity (g = 9.81 m/s²). We can use the following equation of motion to solve for the final velocity: v² = u² + 2as Where: v = final velocity u = initial velocity a = acceleration due to gravity s = distance fallen
We can substitute the values we have and solve for the final velocity of the supplies:v² = 0 + 2(9.81)(347.67)Therefore:v = sqrt(2(9.81)(347.67))v = 83.17 m/s Thus, the speed (m/s) of the supplies as it reaches the mountain climbers is 83.17 m/s.
Know more about mountain climbers here:
https://brainly.com/question/19366049
#SPJ11
A satellite revolving around Earth has an orbital radius of 1.5 x 10^4 km. Gravity being the only force acting on the satellite calculate its time period of motion in seconds. You can use the following numbers for calculation: Mass of Earth=5.97 x 10^24 kg Radius of Earth-6.38 x 10^3 km Newton's Gravitational Constant (G) 6.67 x 10-11 N m2/kg^2 Mass of the Satellite 1050 kg O a. 1.90 x 104 b.4.72 x 10°3 s O c. 11.7 x 10'7 s O d. 3.95 x 10'6 s O e. 4.77 x 10^2 s Of. 2.69 x 10^21 s
The time period of the satellite in motion is 4.85 × 104 seconds. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Given that the orbital radius of the satellite, r = 1.5 × 104 km
Distance from the center of the earth to the satellite = R + r
where R = radius of the earth = 6.38 × 103 km.
G = 6.67 × 10-11 N m2/kg2
m1 = 5.97 × 1024 kg
m2 = 1050 kg
Acceleration due to gravity acting on the satellite,
g = GM/R2
where M = mass of the earth and R = radius of the earth.
The force acting on the satellite,
F = mg
From Newton's second law of motion, we know that
F = ma
Where a is the acceleration of the satellite
Due to the circular motion of the satellite, the force that causes the motion is given by the centripetal force, which is also the force due to gravity. Therefore,
m a = m g
Using the expression for g from equation (1),
a = GM/R2
Therefore,
a = GM/(R + r)2
Substituting the values, we get;
a = 6.67 × 10-11 × 5.97 × 1024/(6.38 × 106 + 1.5 × 107)2a = 0.04024 m/s2The time period of motion is given by,
T = 2π√(r3/GM)
Substituting the values, we get,
T = 2π√(1.5 × 107)3/(6.67 × 10-11 × 5.97 × 1024 + 1050)
T = 2π × 7727.8 seconds
T = 48510.2 seconds = 4.85 × 104 seconds
Learn more about Acceleration due to gravity: https://brainly.com/question/17331289
#SPJ11
Consider the block-spring-surface system in part (B) of Example 8.6.(a) Using an energy approach, find the position x of the block at which its speed is a maximum.
The position x at which the speed of the block is a maximum is given by [tex]x = sqrt((mv^2) / k)[/tex].
To find the position x at which the speed of the block is a maximum in the block-spring-surface system, we can use the principle of conservation of mechanical energy. The total mechanical energy of the system is the sum of the kinetic energy (KE) and the potential energy (PE). At any position x, the kinetic energy is given by KE = [tex](1/2)mv^2[/tex], where m is the mass of the block and v is its velocity.
The potential energy is given by PE = (1/2[tex])kx^2[/tex], where k is the spring constant and x is the displacement of the block. Since mechanical energy is conserved, the sum of the initial kinetic energy and the initial potential energy is equal to the sum of the final kinetic energy and the final potential energy.
We can assume that at the equilibrium position, the block is momentarily at rest. Therefore, the initial kinetic energy is zero. Setting the initial mechanical energy to zero, we have:
[tex]0 + (1/2)kx^2 = (1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)kx^2[/tex]
Simplifying the equation, we have:
[tex](1/2)kx^2 = (1/2)mv^2[/tex]
Dividing both sides of the equation by (1/2)m, we get:
kx^2 = mv^2
Simplifying further, we have:
[tex]x^2 = (mv^2) / k[/tex]
Taking the square root of both sides of the equation, we find: x = sqrt[tex]((mv^2) / k)[/tex]
For more question speed
https://brainly.com/question/13943409
#SPJ8
Two speakers (S1 and S2) are separated by 5.00 m and emit sound waves in all directions with f = 440 Hz. Three people (P1, P2, and P3) are located at different distances from the speakers, as shown: 5.00 m Si S 2.50 m 4.14 m P 10.04 m 14.00 m Question 1 (1 point) Saved Using the universal wave equation (v=fa), determine the wavelength emitted by the speakers when the speed of sound is 345 m/s. Question 2 (5 points) Saved Complete the following table. L1 and L2 represent the path's length from S1 and S2 to the person, respectively. They must be calculated using trigonometry and the data in the figure. Question 3 (1 point) ✓ Saved What is the pattern between AL/A and constructive interference? Par... v B 5 AL = n, where n is any integer. Condition for destructive A Question 4 (1 point) What is the pattern between AL/ and destructive interference? Question 5 (2 points) Do the three people all hear the same thing? Why or why not? or
Using the universal wave equation (v=fa), determine the wavelength emitted by the speakers when the speed of sound is 345 m/s. Given data:Frequency of sound f = 440 Hz
Speed of sound v = 345 m/s
Wavelength λ = v/f= 345/440 = 0.7841 m,
the wavelength emitted by the speakers is 0.7841 m.
Frequency (f) (Hz)440440440
Wavelength (λ) (m)0.78410.78410.7841
Distance from speaker 1 (d1) (m)2.5 4.14 14.0
Distance from speaker 2 (d2) (m)2.5 0.86 10.0
Path length from speaker 1 ([tex]L1) (m)2.5 + 2.5 = 5 4.14 + 2.5 = 6.64 14.0 + 2.5 = 16.5[/tex]
Path length from speaker [tex]2 (L2) (m)5 - 2.5 = 2.5 5 + 0.86 = 5.86 5 + 10.0 = 15.0[/tex]
As a result, they experience different levels of constructive and destructive interference, resulting in different sound intensities.
To know about wavelength visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31143857
#SPJ11
A radio station transmits isotropic Car in all directions) eletromagnetic radiation at fresurney 928 M Hz. At a certain distance from the caulio station the chave intensity I = 0.335 W/m² IS a) what will be the intensity of the wave at half distance from the radio station? b) What is the mave length of the transmitted signale c) If the power of the antenna is 6 MHz, At what distance from the source will the intenste Сp ve be O. 168 W/m ² ? of the d) And, what will be the absorption pressure exerted by the wave at that distance? e) And what will be the effectue electric field. crins) exerted by the by the wave at that distance?
The intensity is 0.084 W/m². The wavelength is 323.28 meters. The distance is approximately 1.27 times the original distance. The absorbed power is 0.168 W/m². The effective electric field strength is 1580.11 V/m.
a) To determine the intensity at half the distance, we can use the inverse square law, which states that the intensity decreases with the square of the distance from the source. Since the initial intensity is 0.335 W/m², at half the distance the intensity would be (0.335/2²) = 0.084 W/m².
b) The wavelength (λ) of the transmitted signal can be calculated using the formula λ = c/f, where c is the speed of light (approximately 3x[tex]10^{8}[/tex]m/s) and f is the frequency of the wave in hertz. Plugging in the values, we get λ = (3x[tex]10^{8}[/tex])/(928x[tex]10^{6}[/tex]) ≈ 323.28 meters.
c) To find the distance where the intensity is 0.168 W/m², we can use the inverse square law again. Let the original distance be D, then the new distance (D') would satisfy the equation (0.335/D²) = (0.168/D'²). Solving for D', we get D' ≈ 1.27D.
d) At the distance where the intensity is 0.168 W/m², the absorbed power would be equal to the intensity itself, which is 0.168 W/m².
e) The effective electric field strength (E) exerted by the wave can be calculated using the formula E = sqrt(2I/ε₀c), where I is the intensity and ε₀ is the vacuum permittivity (approximately 8.854x[tex]10^{-12}[/tex] F/m). Plugging in the values, we get E = sqrt((2x0.168)/(8.854x[tex]10^{-12}[/tex]x3x[tex]10^{8}[/tex])) ≈ 1580.11 V/m.
Learn more about distance here ;
brainly.com/question/29769926
#SPJ11
A uniform ladder of length / -8.0 m is leaning against a frictionless wall at an angle of 50° above
the horizontal. The weight of the ladder is 98 N. A 65-kg woman climbs 6.0 meters up the ladder.
a. (pts) Draw the ladder and the forces acting on the ladder. Label each force accordingly
b. (prs) What is the magnitude of the friction force exerted on the ladder by the floor?
a. The ladder is shown with forces labeled: weight (W), normal force (N), friction force (F), tension force (T), and reaction force (R). b) The magnitude of the friction force exerted on the ladder by the floor is zero
a. The ladder is depicted as a vertical line leaning against a wall at an angle of 50°. The forces acting on the ladder are labeled as follows:
(1) Weight, acting vertically downward at the center of the ladder, labeled as "W" with an arrow pointing downward;
(2) Normal force, acting perpendicular to the floor, labeled as "N" with an arrow pointing upward;
(3) Friction force, acting parallel to the floor, labeled as "F" with an arrow pointing opposite to the direction of motion;
(4) Tension force, acting horizontally at the top of the ladder, labeled as "T" with an arrow pointing to the right;
(5) Reaction force, acting vertically at the bottom of the ladder, labeled as "R" with an arrow pointing upward.
b. Since the ladder is on a frictionless surface, the magnitude of the friction force exerted on the ladder by the floor is zero.
To know more about forces refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/13191643
#SPJ11
Please help! I will vote
You construct a compound microscope
with an eyepiece with a focal length of
6.00 centimeters and an objective with
a focal length of 3.00 millimeters,
separated by 40 centimeters. Which of
the following numbers comes closest to
the overall magnification
The number that comes closest to the overall magnification is 0.5.
To calculate the overall magnification of a compound microscope, we use the formula:
Magnification = (Magnification of Objective) × (Magnification of Eyepiece)
The magnification of the objective lens is calculated by dividing the focal length of the objective lens by the focal length of the eyepiece.
Magnification of Objective = (Focal length of Objective) / (Focal length of Eyepiece)
Given:
Focal length of the eyepiece = 6.00 centimeters = 0.06 meters
Focal length of the objective = 3.00 millimeters = 0.003 meters
Magnification of Objective = (0.003 meters) / (0.06 meters) = 0.05
Now, let's assume a typical magnification value for the eyepiece is around 10x.
Magnification of Eyepiece = 10
Overall Magnification = (Magnification of Objective) × (Magnification of Eyepiece) = 0.05 × 10 = 0.5
To know more about overall magnification refer here
https://brainly.com/question/31393439#
#SPJ11
23. A crane raises a 90 kg piano from the ground to a balcony
that is 12 m above the ground (the piano starts and ends
motionless). How much work was done by the crane on the piano?
(a) 10,600 J (b) 1
The work done by the crane on the piano is approximately 10,584 J.
To calculate the work done by the crane on the piano, we need to determine the change in gravitational potential energy of the piano as it is raised from the ground to the balcony.
The gravitational potential energy (PE) is given by the formula:
PE = m * g * h
where m is the mass of the object, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the change in height.
Given:
m = 90 kg
g = 9.8 m/s^2 (approximate value)
h = 12 m
Substituting these values into the formula:
PE = (90 kg) * (9.8 m/s^2) * (12 m)
PE = 10,584 J (rounded to the nearest whole number)
Therefore, the work done by the crane on the piano is approximately 10,584 J.
Visit here to learn more about gravitational potential energy brainly.com/question/3910603
#SPJ11
An object is located 22.0 cm to the left of a diverging lens having a focal length f = -40.0 cm. (a) Determine the location of the image. distance location to the right of the lens cm (b) Determine the magnification of the image. (c) Construct a ray diagram for this arrangement. Choose File no file selected This answer has not been graded yet. Need Help? Read It Master It
(a) To determine the location of the image formed by the diverging lens, we can use the lens equation:
1/f = 1/di - 1/do
where f is the focal length of the lens, di is the image distance, and do is the object distance.
Given:
f = -40.0 cm (negative sign indicates a diverging lens)
do = -22.0 cm (negative sign indicates the object is to the left of the lens)
Plugging these values into the lens equation:
1/-40.0 = 1/di - 1/-22.0
Simplifying the equation:
-1/40.0 = 1/di + 1/22.0
Now, let's find the common denominator and solve for di:
-22.0/-40.0 = (22.0 + 40.0) / (22.0 * di)
0.55 = 62.0 / (22.0 * di)
22.0 * di = 62.0 / 0.55
di = (62.0 / 0.55) / 22.0
di ≈ 2.0 cm (rounded to one decimal place)
Therefore, the image is formed approximately 2.0 cm to the right of the lens.
(b) The magnification of the image can be calculated using the formula:
magnification = -di / do
Given:
di ≈ 2.0 cm
do = -22.0 cm
Substituting the values:
magnification = -2.0 / -22.0
magnification ≈ 0.091 (rounded to three decimal places)
The magnification of the image is approximately 0.091.
(c) To construct a ray diagram for this arrangement, follow these steps:
Draw a vertical line to represent the principal axis.
Place a diverging lens with a focal length of -40.0 cm on the principal axis, centered at a convenient point.
Mark the object distance (-22.0 cm) to the left of the lens on the principal axis.
Draw a horizontal line originating from the top of the object and passing through the lens.
Draw a line originating from the top of the object and passing through the focal point on the left side of the lens. This ray will be refracted parallel to the principal axis after passing through the lens.
Draw a line originating from the top of the object and passing through the optical center of the lens (located at the center of the lens).
Extend both refracted rays behind the lens, and they will appear to diverge from the point where they intersect.
The point where the extended refracted rays intersect is the location of the image. In this case, the image will be approximately 2.0 cm to the right of the lens.
Note: The ray diagram will show the image as virtual, upright, and reduced in size compared to the object.
To know more about Diverging lens , visit;
https://brainly.com/question/29459725
#SPJ11
When a ceiling fan rotating with an angular speed of 3.26 rad/s is turned off, a frictional torque of 0.135 N⋅m slows it to a stop in 31.3 s.(1) What is the moment of inertia of the fan? Express your answer using three significant figures. I= (?) kg⋅m^2
When a ceiling fan rotating with an angular speed of 3.26 rad/s is turned off, a frictional torque of 0.135 N·m slows it to a stop in 31.3 s. The moment of inertia of the fan is More than 250 kg·m².
(I > 250 kg·m²)Explanation:The work-energy theorem relates the kinetic energy (K) of an object to the work (W) done on the object:W = ΔKFrom the kinematic equation that relates angular displacement (θ), angular speed (ω), angular acceleration (α), and time (t)θ = ωt + ½ αt²The kinematic equation relating angular speed (ω), angular acceleration (α), and time (t) isω = αtThe kinematic equation relating angular speed (ω), linear speed (v), and radius (r) isv = rωThe kinematic equation relating linear acceleration (a),
angular acceleration (α), and radius (r) isa = rαNewton's second law of motion for rotation is expressed asIα = τwhere I is the moment of inertia and τ is the net torque acting on an object.The frictional torque acting on the fan isτ = -0.135 N·mThe angular speed of the fan isω0 = 3.26 rad/sWhen the fan comes to a stop, its angular speed isωf = 0 rad/sThe time taken by the fan to stop ist = 31.3 sThe angular acceleration of the fan isα = (ω.
To know more about kinetic visit:
https://brainly.com/question/999862
#SPJ11